Give the python an SLF!
- Thread starter amadeus1171
- Start date
Harry T. Morey had one, as did Werner Krauss, Michael Parks and Mark Gregory.
Which wouldn't have been a problem except that they all had them on display while starring as Adam in movies about Adam & Eve. [uhh]
Just sayin'.....
![[VR] Deggial](https://forums-cdn.zaonce.net/data/avatars/m/47/47252.jpg?1553527110){kind=avatar}
NO ship works great with multi-crew turrets. This is as true for the Python as it is for any other ship.
The initial claim was, that the Python was created before the introduction of multi-crew and therefore should be "upgraded" with an SLF.
By this logic, every ship should get such an addition, because (and please read my post again, you seem to have overlooked this) I clearly stated that SLFs are the actual fun part of multi-crew.
Just give the old girl 6 utilities.
I still have an use my Python. I emphatically vote NO on this.
This is a proposal for which I would vote yes. Or even just 5 utility slots, if six is "too much". The Python is really hampered by only 4. Why is the FDL the only medium ship with 6?
This is a proposal for which I would vote yes. Or even just 5 utility slots, if six is "too much". The Python is really hampered by only 4. Why is the FDL the only medium ship with 6?
now really
how do you upgrade that ship with an slf?
shall the slf just warp in from a subspacepocket whenever deployed?
count the number of internal slots of the FDL
If the Python got 1 or 2 more utility mount(s), then the FDS, FAS and FGS should get 1 more utility mount up front and center of the ships (Like the Asp E) so they could mount a Point Defence, theres already a spot for it.
Yes, and courier's speed and turn rate to anaconda
I agree with this. The utility slots on the python are too few.
No problem with this if the Clipper gets 6, and then has its hard points moved to a more central location.
Why can’t I have my Python like the one I have in Elite frontier ? Due to a game code “issue” it’s cargo hold is bigger on the inside so I could haul 1000’s of tons a trip, add it to that system where diamonds were a waste material they paid you to get rid of, it was a win win situation. Much better that a SLF. Get station rebuilds done in one trip mine a whole asteroid field in one go. Bankrupt a system. What’s not to like LOL
and while doing that,
also giving me access to that plasma accelerator beam that is able to annihilate whole cities in one shot
As much as I love the Python, no, thanks. It is already great and does not need a SLF.
Personally, I would not put an SLF on my Python because mine is not a combat ship. However, if devs decided to do something with this topic I would say make the SRV bay capable of having Either an SLF or SRV but not both.
I know a lot of ppl use the Python for combat but I don't. Its too pretty and useful for other things like passenger missions, cargo hauling and mission running.
I know a lot of ppl use the Python for combat but I don't. Its too pretty and useful for other things like passenger missions, cargo hauling and mission running.
Probably been said already but you can synthesize these upgrades to your SRV, both fuel and hull.
I just bought 5 of them and I say no as well.
![[VR] Mad Mike](https://forums-cdn.zaonce.net/data/avatars/m/27/27910.jpg?1553527108){kind=avatar}
and while doing that,
also giving me access to that plasma accelerator beam that is able to annihilate whole cities in one shot
if we are going down that road, give me the ships crew that we needed back then, time acceleration and the energy bomb
(aint gonna happen)
This is as wise as it sounds. That means we can dock with a sidewinder and piggy back ride when exploring.
It would also allow to hide from attackers in the Anaconda hold. And they could share power, meaning plenty of cool repair/survival options.
That would make a very fun and good game!
There is NO reason AT ALL to not make it so.
Last edited:
I don't understand how so many people are against this. If it can fit in a ship it should be equipable. And it can definitely fit. Doesn't make the ship overpowered etc. as you still have to drop an SCB or Cargo Hold or whatever you need to drop to put in a fighter bay instead. There is only upside and no downside that I can see, or that anyone has argued. Mostly I see facetious red-herrings about wanting super weapons or whatever.
How would it affect negatively your gameplay if medium ships that can fit a fighter bay physically, but that don't have one now, get one? Serious question.
How would it affect negatively your gameplay if medium ships that can fit a fighter bay physically, but that don't have one now, get one? Serious question.