I wrote another paper where I tried to do experiment 1 that you listed above.
Oh, thanks. I didn't see that one. Really nice work! I really hope, the answer to question 0 is "yes" - I see no other way to correlate concrete information to the audio data otherwise...
A side note: I wouldn't call the last 'N' bar (in 'NE') 'N' but 'F' (like final or something). It doesn't start from 6kHz (or below) but from 7kHz and it even sounds different.
Btw. there could be a hint, that the data is in fact kinda random as you suggest in your second article. Ram Tah says in the messages (technology 7):
This is very interesting. According to the data package you just sent me the monolith network was used for most if not all communications regardless of importance. In keeping with their predilection for sharing knowledge, few restrictions were placed on the network. I thought there might have been separate networks for military and administrative use, but I haven’t found any evidence of that. Everything points to an extremely open society, which would have made them even more vulnerable when significant social divisions arose.
Which gives me an idea: did we try to sort the packets by the first or last bar? The first (or first few) bars could indicate a category, where the data belongs to (similar to IP addresses in network communication).
A final question: Is there any chance to get these data transcriptions from you, Maligno?
Last edited: