Horizons: 64 bit only; DX11 only

On general principles I'd have to say "yes". However the only way to be sure is to run the game on the hardware and see if you're happy with it. If you did upgrade, I'd say increase the RAM to 8GB and get a better graphics card (maybe at least a GTX750ti? - I don't know how good your PSU is, but the best GPU you can get). It wouldn't cost a fortune, really. Hang around ebay looking for used parts, if you need to squeeze every penny.

The CPU is only dual core, so is underpowered according to specs. But that often doesn't much matter for games.

Thank you for your reply! =)

Well, actually I was thinking about a 750ti, but I wanted to wait until Horizons arrive.
My PSU is 450W, so I think it's a bit weak isn't it? Actually Elite runs on 1080p medium settings, I'm perfectly happy with it. Well I wait for Horizons for sure, and if 4 will be less, then I'm gonna upgrade it to 8 GB!
 
Past configuration :

Intel G3420 / GTX 670 / 8G DDR3 / SSD : runs in fullHD, doesnt lag, very smooth game.
this PC wont run horizon

now i have to explain that to the 2 future Space Pilots that earth is going to lose, explain them that a huge brain, deep motivation, cleverness, are not enough. World runs on money.

:_(

If you do actually have the first three, the forth shouldn't be much of a problem.

If you're pretty as well, then the forth pretty much takes care of itself.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

Thank you for your reply! =)

Well, actually I was thinking about a 750ti, but I wanted to wait until Horizons arrive.
My PSU is 450W, so I think it's a bit weak isn't it? Actually Elite runs on 1080p medium settings, I'm perfectly happy with it. Well I wait for Horizons for sure, and if 4 will be less, then I'm gonna upgrade it to 8 GB!

Yeah. 450w is a little bit shy, but Nvidia's latest GPUS are very power efficient (especially the 750ti) with the newer Maxwell cores and I don't think you'd have a problem.
 
With 450w psu you can use up to Nvidia 960 as that need a 400w psu. A 970 requires 500w.
Yeah the Maxwell tech is great!
 
its too bad that my darn post got closed only wanted a simple darn answer. Now AGAIN will this cpu run ed..
http://postimg.org/image/qap2o9xv1/


Heh - be polite. Everyone wants an answer and it's better for everyone that there is one place to find them, instead of 5 ( at the last count).

I do not see the relationship between a thread on the software spécifications on Windows 32/64-bit (this thread) and a thread on the hardware spécifications (my thread). Lack of discernment ... A thread dedicated exclusively to the hardware specifications was appropriate. Not happy with your sudden abolition of my thread
 
Last edited:
I've bought the life time expansion pass for my son but now his machine is too old for 2.0

We won't be buggy racing together until after Xmas when I can afford to upgrade it.

It's to be expected though, the game is using cutting edge technology and pushing the boundaries of what is possible.

Next season will probably push it further.

EDIT: For he record, it is very common in the industry to not know or be able to predict system requirements until a very late stage of implementation.

The landing on the planets with atmosphere, the life, the landscapes, certainly will require even more resources

:)
 
Last edited:
Haven't read the whole thread, but perhaps one of the hardware pros around could answer my question without much difficulty: I have been playing ED since premium Beta with an old i3, 4GB RAM and a new GTX970 from MSI. The game runs beautifully with constant 60fps with Ultra settings - apart from occasional dips to 45fps in busy RES or CZ.

I am already planning to upgrade my CPU, main board and RAM, mainly to be able to play ED including Horizons on the Rift when the CV is released.
Now, I am aware the newsletter stated VR requirements for Horizons would be announced soon, but based in the experience you guys made with the DK2, will I be able to fully enjoy ED including Horizons on the OR CV with my 970 if I upgrade the CPU to a modern Skylake i5 and RAM to 16GB? Or will I need a SLI setup with two 970 to play Horizons on OR?
 
Last edited:
If your motherboard supports it, the R7 graphics in the APU can be overclocked to good effect.

To be honest. I went with this setup for a while, but I actually found the inbuilt GPU did a surprisingly good job on it's own and the dual-graphics setup caused some minor issues, so I went back to using just the APU setup. 2400Mhz RAM makes quite a difference, assign 2gb of 8gb system total to Graphics and it's a pretty amazingly cheap gaming rig.

I did eventually fit an R9 270. It's better, but actually i'm still impressed with how well the APU did on it's own. Unfortunately AMD's marketing has been egregious. It isn't a high-end gaming solution, it's a cheap way to get into the PC gaming...um... game... Allowing you to build a gaming PC for the price of a console...

I got 8GB of 2400MHz RAM. The Dual graphics doesn't seem to cause any issues with Elite.
I know it isn't a serious gaming rig, but so amazingly cheap!
 
Tbh I will eat my hat if my 2500k even struggles with horizons..... Not that it really matters. After nearly 5 years service it is getting time to upgrade and migrate the trusty sandybridge to my arcade.

I have one of these as well. Let's see how the beta runs, I expect I'll grab a new GPU and PSU to power it, but would like to hold off ditching the rest of it until we know exactly what's required for a good VR experience.
 
FWIW. I have confirmation that the main reason for the jump to 6GB ram is due to inefficiencies in the GPU drivers requiring more. :p

I only have 4GiB RAM and hope they will not enforce the 6GiB limit and that it will run (my GPU also has 4GiB VRAM).
 
Hmm, just read the latest newsletter and it states that the minimum GPU is a GTX 470 ... I have a GTX 460 and there does not seem to be too much difference between the two, so would any know if the reason for specifing the 470 as the minium is likely to be down to a pure speed/memory throughput or due to some sort of differing in instruction sets between the two cards?

Really don't want to have to upgrade (can't in fact afford to upgrade right now) so that would be a bit of a pain if the 460 wont be up to scrath even for minimal settings ...
 
Hmm, just read the latest newsletter and it states that the minimum GPU is a GTX 470 ... I have a GTX 460 and there does not seem to be too much difference between the two, so would any know if the reason for specifing the 470 as the minium is likely to be down to a pure speed/memory throughput or due to some sort of differing in instruction sets between the two cards?

Really don't want to have to upgrade (can't in fact afford to upgrade right now) so that would be a bit of a pain if the 460 wont be up to scrath even for minimal settings ...

I have the same GPU, you could try MSI Afterburner and overclock it- a 460 can be pushed a fair way. From conservative overclocks I gained 10% more speed.
 
You do know that x86-64 cpu's os's and games have been around on the pc for quite some time and consoles have only just (this gen) got 64 bit processors so please stop spouting bull
 
Last edited:
guys do i have to upgrade to windows 10 before horizons hits? for the dx12 stuff?...im currently on 8.1
3 times i have installed win 10 using the friendly pop up when i boot,every time it works on the first boot,but second time around no folders display when opened or anything,baffles me

There is no dx12 stuff yet so windows 10 is not required.

I'd guess dx12 will be used on Xbox version first then windows versions later.
 
Last edited:
My PSU is 450W, so I think it's a bit weak isn't it?
That's actually a surprisingly complex question to answer. I suspect there are going to be lots of people looking to upgrade their graphics card in the run up to Horizons and wondering if their PSU is good enough for a particular card. In an ideal world you'd just check what PSU the card needs and if your PSU matches or exceeds that output, buy the card and be happy.

Unfortunately the reality isn't like that. The first complicating factor is that a PSU's total output is divided into different voltages, generally 12v, 5v and 3.3v. Graphics cards and CPUs run from the 12v output (it's usually referred to as the 12v 'rail') so it's the capacity of the 12v rail alone that matters for graphics cards. That will be listed on the sticker on the side of the PSU, often expressed as 'A' for Amps. To get the wattage you just multiply the amps by the voltage (12 in this case), so a PSU marked as 25A @ 12V can output 25x12 or 300W of power on the 12v rail. Sometime graphics card manufacturers will quote the amperage required for a card on its web page. This will generally be fairly accurate, although some do err on the high side.

But some manufacturers just say 'needs 500W PSU' or similar, which is completely useless because of how much PSUs vary in their output, both on the 12v rail and in total.

A cheap no-brand '500W' PSU bought from ebay or Amazon for £15 might be able to put out 200W on the 12v rail before it makes a loud noise and starts to emit nasty smelling smoke from the back; the figures on the specification sticker will be outright lies.

On the other hand an expensive 500W PSU from a good brand like Antec, Corsair or Seasonic should be rated to pump out as much as 480W on the 12v rail and in real world use will be able to sustain that easily.

As an example of this; I have a Radeon 290 in one of my gaming PCs. The manufacturer recommends a 750W PSU for this, but I run the 290 and a quad-core i5 CPU from a good quality 500W PSU without problems. My main gaming box has a pair of 290s and an i7 running from a high-end 850W PSU, again with no problems.

tl;dr - what graphics card any given PSU will safely run is complex. The best way of working it out is to make a post here with the make/model of the PSU, a picture of the spec sicker, and let someone who knows about this stuff figure it out for you :D
 
mmmmm.... having the first three implies the fourth is no problem... mmmmh.... welcome to france, let me explain.
in most countries, gifted kids are taken care of, teachers take good care of them, are aware of their specifities, feed their endless need of knowledge, encourage and guide them on the road of education.
well in france, no. gifted kids are most of the time ignored. they ask too much questions. they dont explain how they guessed the correct answer a second after the teacher asked. they end up at the age of 7 or 8, at the bottom of the classroom, bored to death, fighting against the urge of running away from school. That s what happened to me, and guess what, it kept happening in the companies i was working in.
being a Mensa member is considered a threat. 95% of the time, having a high IQ will make you fail your job interview. You have to hide, you have to shut up, if you get the job, you ll have to let your colleagues apply their "failed in advance stupid ideas" and witness the damages without saying a word. I heard UK, germany, northern countries act differently. I heard in USA gifted people are treasured. In france, they're shot on sight.

If i chose not to work full time so i can take care of my kids, it s to protect them from this kind of future. I spend weeks negociating and fighting with the schools so my kids are recognized as special, and taken care of correctly. At home i have to feed their thirst of new knowledges. Elite is a very good game for them. They discover stars, planets, understand how the galaxy is "in real", it s something else than looking at saturn's satellites through a telescope, it looks "real".

my elder wants and most probably will be a pilot. the younger seems very interested by the human body, maybe a future surgeon, or the best guitar player in the world. He s good with a guitar, since he was 14 months old.

i m moving sky and earth to see if i can get some 2nd hand hardware, waiting for next's week beta to see concretely if my wife pc can run horizon B2.0. My own computer is not a big deal, i dont need to play, in 2 months (i bought the game 14 months ago....managed to run it in september....) i managed to grind enough credits to get a 22M ASP, found a couple earthlikes, goal achieved. I just hope rovers wont be too much expensive so we can land somewhere and let the kids roam free on a moon somewhere far from pirates and troubles.

still, it hurts to be unable to provide a couple hundred euros, having myself a big (useless and uneducated) brain.
hurts even more when people assume being gifted means your life is great and paved with gold. it s everything but that. especially in a world like ours, where being hypersensitive is not exactly something easy to carry.

30yrs ago i played elite on a green monocolor monitor. I could cope with less antialiasing, less details, less shadows and less HDR effects, as long as the game runs. I hope Horizons will just "run" and wont crash with a message "your hardware does not allow you to play Horizons"

edit : oh yeah.... PSU.... forgot that both computers have less than 50W margin to 100% load. good thing they're seasonics... (2008's seasonics....)

As much as I truly am sorry that you are in that situation, I can only say that the politicians you select are the once you guys need to blame. Many politicians in power are utterly useless and still people select them. I hope that ED still will be enjoyable for you.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

Yeah absolutely. The only thing holding the game back is available hardware TBH

Well, let me see that :) my rig is falling asleep here..
 
Hmm, just read the latest newsletter and it states that the minimum GPU is a GTX 470 ... I have a GTX 460 and there does not seem to be too much difference between the two, so would any know if the reason for specifing the 470 as the minium is likely to be down to a pure speed/memory throughput or due to some sort of differing in instruction sets between the two cards?

Really don't want to have to upgrade (can't in fact afford to upgrade right now) so that would be a bit of a pain if the 460 wont be up to scrath even for minimal settings ...
I would not bother too much about this, the only meaningfull part of this requirements are DX11 and 64 bit. Everything else performance related... well, quad core CPU is also "required" (and in current version of game too) which is not true at all, game runs just fine on modern dual core CPU-s with maximum quality settings. It will also run fine on GTX460 i suspect, probably with some compromises in quality settings.
 
Last edited:
I think it's a good thing. It's reasonable that the minimum spec goes up with each season as tech advances.

Looks like they're recommending i7's now, too. I suppose I'll give my i5 a whirl first before upgrading, but there must be a lot going on under the hood, leading to notable performance issues. I suppose that's a good thing, in its own right. Means there's so much new content to process, it requires faster machines. :) I seem to recall one of the reasons Bell & Braben opted to make it a space game originally because it was easier to render the blank background with less memory. Knowing nothing of memory requirements, admittedly, I suspect the transition to planetside -- seeing rocks and mountains and dust, etc. up close -- has much higher rendering issues.
 
Back
Top Bottom