Hybrids

Well mainly because tinywolf, Tarbosaurus got famous from the Korean movie Speckles the Tarbosaurus and I really love this creature, I think this game needs another tyrannosaur species since it appeared in Jurassic World Alive. But I would like to see five different species of tyrannosaurs in the game such as Gorgosaurus, Albertosaurus, Daspletosaurus, Tarbosaurus (like I mentioned before), and Tyrannosaurus Rex (which it's the only rex in the game).

Also, I agree with you on the Euoplocephalus in the game since it's from the novel.
Like Tinywolf said, Tarbosaurus is nearly identical to T. rex. Some scientists even classify it as Tyrannosaurus bataar instead of Tarbosaurus bataar so similar are they.
The same kinda goes for Albertosaurus and Gorgosaurus. They are really similar and the same size and some scientists also classify Gorgosaurus as Albertosaurus. Either Albertosaurus or Gorgosaurus would be a good addition, but having both just doesn't really add anything.
 
I'd love to see the other two hybrids that popped up on screens in Jurassic World...some of the others would be interesting as well. Even the old chaos effect ones would be fun to have available so there's enough to have a whole park of them if you want it.

There are also some actual dinosaurs that I really wish would appear such as the ankylosaur and small tyrannosaur that the corpses of are in Fallen Kingdom
 
I think hyBIRD is not authentic dinosaurs in reality. because not found fossil

should dinosaurs hyBIRD not be made! where is the authenticity hyBIRD is not reality and no have fossil

Mispelled "hybrid", or actually a word game about birds being dinosaurs?
QrkL7q5.jpg
 
Jurassic park was a great movie because it was (for the time) scientifically accurate.
Back in the 80s when people thinked about dinos they usually imagine some kind of big, slow and stupid lizards.
When JP came out M.Crichton and Spielberg pulverize those stereotypes embracing the newest theory that paleontology had developed.

Now I understand that it's not possible anymore to update what dinos look like because that wold be incosistent with the movie canons but WHAT THE HECK, how you cold find something stupid like hybrids attractive? At this point I guess they could just put into the movie some kind of mad monsters like the Kaijus from Pacific Rim and you could still find that enjoiable.
That is so dumb...
 
Jurassic park was a great movie because it was (for the time) scientifically accurate.
Back in the 80s when people thinked about dinos they usually imagine some kind of big, slow and stupid lizards.
When JP came out M.Crichton and Spielberg pulverize those stereotypes embracing the newest theory that paleontology had developed.

Now I understand that it's not possible anymore to update what dinos look like because that wold be incosistent with the movie canons but WHAT THE HECK, how you cold find something stupid like hybrids attractive? At this point I guess they could just put into the movie some kind of mad monsters like the Kaijus from Pacific Rim and you could still find that enjoiable.
That is so dumb...

Jurassic World had to do something new to entice the audience. If they didn't than it probably wasn't as big of a hit. As for hybrids people still have their limits. Many people hated the Indoraptor I am 50/50. The Indominus Rex was the only hybrid from the movies that looks close to a real dinosaur. In the game only Spinoraptor looks like a dinosaur.
 
Jurassic park was a great movie because it was (for the time) scientifically accurate.
Back in the 80s when people thinked about dinos they usually imagine some kind of big, slow and stupid lizards.
When JP came out M.Crichton and Spielberg pulverize those stereotypes embracing the newest theory that paleontology had developed.

JP wasn't scientifically accurate at all. Every hybrid right now is more realistic than the Dilophosaurus. It was also decades behind the dinosaur rennaisance, just because the average public still thought of dinosaurs as dumb and slow (which they still do) doesn't mean any of that was new.

As for hybrids, it's fun to mix and match legos. I don't know about anyone else, but I had a bunch of Jurassic Park hybrid toys at the time as well as an MS-DOS game letting you combine dinosaurs.

Most people playing this game won't be paleo nerds but casual franchise fans, the same people who made hybrid heavy movies like JW and Fallen Kingdom billion dollar movies after actual dinosaurs had audiences tapping out.
 
JP wasn't scientifically accurate at all. Every hybrid right now is more realistic than the Dilophosaurus. It was also decades behind the dinosaur rennaisance, just because the average public still thought of dinosaurs as dumb and slow (which they still do) doesn't mean any of that was new.

As for hybrids, it's fun to mix and match legos. I don't know about anyone else, but I had a bunch of Jurassic Park hybrid toys at the time as well as an MS-DOS game letting you combine dinosaurs.

Most people playing this game won't be paleo nerds but casual franchise fans, the same people who made hybrid heavy movies like JW and Fallen Kingdom billion dollar movies after actual dinosaurs had audiences tapping out.

What was unrealistic about the Dilo?? We have no clue, if they had a frill or were venomous. We can't tell from fossils... And they said in JP1, that it was a herd of young Dilo's, which explains the size. So nothing unrealistic about them. Guessing doesn't make it unrealistic, as we can't prove JP was wrong. Well the only thing you could say is unrealistic, is that only the males had the two crests... And all the animals in the film were female.

What do you mean about audience tapping out?? Jurassic World would have made just as much money if the Hybrids weren't included. I don't know one person that said, "I wanna go and see the hybrids". They want to see the dinosaurs. If you removed the original dinosaurs on the other hand, no one would've watched it... The franchise is carried by dinosaurs. Not unrealistic sci-fi creatures...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom