I guess I'll add a graphics tweak too, to be helpful

I have an older graphics. It is a GTX 770 with 2gb vram. I just upgraded everything else this week and it is far above specs on all other components. I even have 64 GB system RAM. Before the expansion, with much older components and 8GB system ram, I could play at 4k on my 55 inch TV and it was OK. Nothing great but the settings could be turned up toward the high side.

The settings that matters the most with my card, out of all the settings, is superscaling. You can read about that online but if I understand it correctly, it involves changing the size of the frame somewhere in the graphics pipeline before doing some of the graphics work. This should change the results of the final frame positively if you can superscale larger than 1x. Playing at 4k with 1x superscaling involves the graphical work to be done on a 4k frame. If it is set at 2x superscaling the frame is 4x the size (I think. Because it doubles the width and height). If it set at .5 superscaling the frame is 4x smaller because the frame is half the height and width.

Before the expansion, I could play at 4k but it was a bit sluggish at 1x superscaling so I turned it down to .75. After the expansion it is much much more sluggish than it was before. I had to drop my resolution down to 1080p and set superscaling to 1x to get it snappy enough.

My card is pretty though. I can make it playable but I won't really enjoy it until I can get it upgraded. I hope if my understanding of how much the size of the frame changes during superscaling is wrong, someone will correct me.

EDIT
I don't know if it is a VRAM problem. Maybe there are more things in the memory than before and it has to swap too much. I witness a very slow load in time for the textures to fully load and make the model look complete. I can literally watch the SRV on the title screen get better looking over many seconds as it loads in, what appears to be, every level of distance detail mapping from furthest to closest.
 
Last edited:
Get a new graphics card. It simply doesnt have even close to the necessary hardware to push out Elites graphics, on even the smallest of settings. I wouldnt even consider playing this game on a 1080 TI. I have a 2080 TI and thats the very LEAST I would consider using.
 
Get a new graphics card. It simply doesnt have even close to the necessary hardware to push out Elites graphics, on even the smallest of settings. I wouldnt even consider playing this game on a 1080 TI. I have a 2080 TI and thats the very LEAST I would consider using.

Recommended specs is gtx 1060 or rx 580. So you really do not need a 2080ti minimum. What a nonsense

You can at least explain what resolution/framerates you want to achieve that you 'need' a 2080ti

I would like to get a new one but they are very over priced right now.
 
I'd live with the current one for now, however it performs. With the prices of even moderate ones x2 the right price, its not worth buying now.

My 1080 does 1920x1200 perfectly well in high.
 
Get a new graphics card. It simply doesnt have even close to the necessary hardware to push out Elites graphics, on even the smallest of settings. I wouldnt even consider playing this game on a 1080 TI. I have a 2080 TI and thats the very LEAST I would consider using.
No, no, no! Jeebus! You can throw whatever hardware you want at ED:O and it will not run well station/planet side. Do not base any decisions about your hardware on how ED:O runs on it at the moment.
 
I'm on a 1070ti, which ran 4k top settings fine for 60hz. I've dropped down to 1080 and dialled a lot of settings down and I can get 30fps on the planet surface.

I woul have been impressed in 2004.
 
Get a new graphics card. It simply doesnt have even close to the necessary hardware to push out Elites graphics, on even the smallest of settings. I wouldnt even consider playing this game on a 1080 TI. I have a 2080 TI and thats the very LEAST I would consider using.

I ran Horizons on a GTX 750 TI at 60fps and high graphics.
 
Get a new graphics card. It simply doesnt have even close to the necessary hardware to push out Elites graphics, on even the smallest of settings. I wouldnt even consider playing this game on a 1080 TI. I have a 2080 TI and thats the very LEAST I would consider using.

I'm playing using a 1080ti, a 1440p monitor at 144hz, 64GB of 3200mhz ram with a Ryzen 9 3900x.

In Ultra, I'm getting a full 144 FPS in space, 50-100fps on stations and about 40 - 90 fps on planets. While I have taken a noticeable dip in FPS compared to Horizions, it still is extremely playable, I would imagine even less spec'd cards would have very good results.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom