What medium ships are more useful in your opinion? Why?
I have now extensively used The Cutter, Federal Corvette, and the Anaconda and here is what I have learned.
- Thread starter CoyoteXStarrk
- Start date
We all have our own preferences. If thes large ships offered something unique like needing NPCs to run, then I might consider them as they offer something else.
Yeah I just don't count the T-10 among the Big 3 because each of the Big 3 is exceptional in at least 2 areas. The Vette has its maneuverability and its combat ability, the Cutter has its shields and its cargo capacity, and the Conda has its jump range and its versatility. The T-10's only exceptional quality is its armor and thats about it.
For combat I prefer either the Mamba or Challenger. I even engineered a crusader with a SLF and it actually surprised me at how good it really is.
Personally I prefer medium ships for exploration. Have a fleet of them including another Mamba that I took and completed DW2 with. Though recently I made a little DBS into one.
Though technically its a "large ship" I still see the clipper as a medium ship and use it for void opals when I feel like mining. Though that is rare these days. Been thinking of making a second Python into a mining ship.
I used a Type-6 to do the Guardian mission that Ram-Tah gave out and the Thargoid one Palin gave.
Don't do passenger missions anymore with the Exception of a Beluga i have parked far away for special, occasions
I just use medium ships for material gathering and surface missions like the scanning and base attack missions. My Challenger does those ones.. Have that super cold DBS for megaship hacking. I just can't think of a use these days for any of my "Big Three". My T-10's are also gathering dust.
To each their own I guess, but I personally would prefer one of the Big 3 for each of those tasks.
The T10 is unique in its ability to sit at a resting heat of 12% while carrying 24 reverb torps.
Correct major Corvette flaw asap, please!!
Let alone the Pilots seat, the canopy too has to be covered in crocodile leather. Thank you for your kind consideration.
Deleted member 182079
D
The Anaconda is immediately disqualified from any sort of contest because of it's fugliness.
![[PS4] Filthymick420](https://forums-cdn.zaonce.net/data/avatars/m/201/201444.jpg?1555738739){kind=avatar}
sigh eye of the beerholder, remember? Opinions dont qualify as facts. If they did pick up trucks wouldn't be able to win any awards because i dont like them. I veiw them as someone needs to over compensate for something unless its a work related use. As it stands my opinion of pick up trucks means diddily squat to anyone who has a different opinion. But if you feel that way its fine. Im personally not a fan either.
I think the Anaconda looks pretty nice
Deleted member 182079
D
Nope. Objectively awful to anyone's eyes. Like a snake (an anaconda, say) ate an 18 wheeler but can't digest it so carries it around henceforth, like a Kangaroo.
I subjectively think, that the Conda is quite a handsome spaceship (except the bridge that looks like a 70s Chevy), whereas the Cutter looks like it's made of cheap plastic. Apart from that, I agree with most post here. The Cutter is an ugly trader, the Conda is a big heavy allrounder and the Corvette is an OP material harvester for PvE. The small and medium ships are not as efficient as the biggies, but they are much more fun, and let's face it, most of us are here for the fun.
Are you the guy who killed the Donnager?
you can't expect me to remember the name of everyone I've deleted with an entirely unnecessary amount of ordnance.
I think my camera angle makes my Conda look more phallic than your Cutter, and phallic is a very important factor when it comes to spaceshipsI cant confirm that
