Don't come at me with the etymological fallacy. There's a difference between an etymology and a definition. You don't have to share bread with someone to be their companion, and if you're in charge of the bread, you're not automatically a lord. We've been specifically warned a couple of times now not to get bogged down with wider issues of real-world politics, so I'm not going to get into an argument about definitions of specific political movements. I was simply observing that such definitions have a necessary connection with historical sources - using them as rhetorical bludgeons is a widespread political vice that helps no-one
Oh I was being quite accurate and specific. People trip up on their understanding of fascism that it is limited to far-right movements or requiring the presence of nationalism.
I believe it was George Orwell who predicted that the next time fascism would rise to dominance it would be on the left.
If you understand what fascism is, you would see that there are many major factions in Elite that are fascist.
Perhaps even the imperium itself.
1. A group is defined and elevated in worth/importance/intelligence/something above those outside it
2. The doctrine of the group is not to be questioned, challanged or critically examined
3. Enforcement is used to keep those who subscribe to the doctrine of 1 mind, and recruit new members (wrong think will be punished - join us or suffer)
I dunno about you, but when you consider everything that's gone on with the marlinists..... I'm just glad I fly a tricked out vette and not one of those imperial i-ships