Doesn't explain how some of the more influential nutters actually make a living out of it though. [sad]
How do preachers make money on TV? Unfortunately the answer is not nice. People buy into all-sorts.
Last edited:
Doesn't explain how some of the more influential nutters actually make a living out of it though. [sad]
Terry Pratchett, got quite a bit of attention.
Terry Pratchett, got quite a bit of attention.
This is what I'd like to think too; that it's just people trolling.
Doesn't explain how some of the more influential nutters actually make a living out of it though. [sad]
Nevah hoid of em
As the title says .... or asks really .... I'm curious - do any Flat Earthers from anywhere around the globe play Elite : Dangerous?
For some reason the concept of a 'Flat Earth' seems to have popped up again around the recent eclipse seen across America. Ironically one of the best bits of eclipse video I saw was actually from someone stating how it was due to a flat earth and there is some sort of hoax going on ... ? ... No, I didn't understand it either.
Anyway, I thought the flat earth idea was dead and buried long ago, but some of them have recently popped up again on the internet all around the globe! (yes, the classic line ....!)![]()
Yes there are many dumb flat Earth folk out there and there are many dumb Round Earth people out there.
The movement (and not the generalist nonsense) has a purpose at heart which demands that scientist prove beyond any doubt all received fact is evidence and unshakeable.
Personally I've sent a cam up in a balloon. I have my own footage of the curvature of the horizon.
Not many folk realize that flat earth movement is a very clever existentialist devil's advocate group of scientist (with a heck of a lot of dumb followers). Part of the fundamental mission statement is to test scientific theory and fact beyond a doubt, meaning personal 1st hand understanding. 'Flat Earth' being a metaphor for the endevour. The movement (and not the generalist nonsense) has a purpose at heart which demands that scientist prove beyond any doubt all received fact is evidence and unshakeable. 'Flat Earth' eeejits (not sure of the technical term) are as correct as many of 'the world is round' believers because both sides have just accepted something they have been told by an authority without conducting any scientific experimentation themselves to prove or disprove a common belief.
Yes there are many dumb flat Earth folk out there and there are many dumb Round Earth people out there. The point is dont take someone elses ideas as truth without 1st hand evidence. Standing steadfast by common sense is not the same as good sense.
As can be seen in the follwing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNLZntSdyKE
Not to mention the arguments raised by flat-earthers are pretty wild, far-fetched and absurd. I prefer Ocham's Razor myself. The tens of thousands of boats "provided by the UN needed to patrol the edge of the earth from people finding the truth" seem a wee bit far fetched to me.
Many people that believe that the earth is flat are religious so it is very easy for them to believe that the Earth is flat when they see something like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEZ7GgXPUck
Not many folk realize that flat earth movement is a very clever existentialist devil's advocate group of scientist (with a heck of a lot of dumb followers). Part of the fundamental mission statement is to test scientific theory and fact beyond a doubt, meaning personal 1st hand understanding. 'Flat Earth' being a metaphor for the endevour. The movement (and not the generalist nonsense) has a purpose at heart which demands that scientist prove beyond any doubt all received fact is evidence and unshakeable. 'Flat Earth' eeejits (not sure of the technical term) are as correct as many of 'the world is round' believers because both sides have just accepted something they have been told by an authority without conducting any scientific experimentation themselves to prove or disprove a common belief.
Yes there are many dumb flat Earth folk out there and there are many dumb Round Earth people out there. The point is dont take someone elses ideas as truth without 1st hand evidence. Standing steadfast by common sense is not the same as good sense.
As can be seen in the follwing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNLZntSdyKE
No need to do that - just look out across the sea ( or a really big lake ) ...
There are no "round Earth people", the Earth is round whether anyone believes it or not.
Can you prove it without any reference to another source?
The idea that you should not believe anything without first-hand evidence is bizarre.
So a belief in pixies that mend sock, a invisible omnipresent deity and Santa that comes down the chimney to deliver presents to children who have behaved in the local cultures deintifion of status quo (jang jang) is totally fine without evidence?
I'm not able to do experiments that prove that my cold symptoms are caused by a virus. Does that mean I should be sceptical of this?
Yes. Same as people who thought bleeding, leeches, bad humors and so forth were cures for common ailments
It is perfectly valid to reply on secondary sources for information, as long as you treat those sources critically.
Which answers your question "Does that mean I should be sceptical of this?"
That's why peer review exists - to help us sort the good sources from the bad.
If your peers are all Flat Earth People would they be right just because the agree with each other?
Once many people belived the world was flat. One chap proved to himself the world was round. So all the clever scientst at the time were wrong and the people who couldnt work stuff out for thme selves followed the next set of thought.
So here's something folk might find fun. Take some time and go for a walk and prove to yourself that the world is round and not flat without referencing someone else to get your truth.
Then this movement is utterly ignorant about how science works "Im not able to do experiments that prove...". Scientists gather the best evidence available and present a theory based on that evidence. If new evidence emerges that falsifies that theory, a good scientist discards the theory in favour of a new one. It is absolutely not the job of science or scientists to produce "unshakeable" theories.
It's all good fun,
Most importantly fancy a pint?
[video=youtube;8VgQPOK_wuo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VgQPOK_wuo[/video]