Do governments have limits? basically no one should own these weapons but there you go, every country who want them can have it, from Iran to NK.
yeah, specially the only one who already used it twice on civilian population. self defense, i guess!
Do governments have limits? basically no one should own these weapons but there you go, every country who want them can have it, from Iran to NK.
Do governments have limits? basically no one should own these weapons but there you go, every country who want them can have it, from Iran to NK.
well, I didn't vote for that one, and I agree it was wrong however in that period of time it could have been anyone, the Germans was pretty close and then it would have been London or anything else that made them angry which was 70% of the planetyeah, specially the only one who already used it twice on civilian population. self defense, i guess!
They should, what people do is their business not the Government or other people. However with Nuclear you can make a lot of boom, you can't do that with even a tank. BTW you can own a tank if you want in the US.I am not asking for governments. Do you feel individual citizens should be able to own these? And if not, where do you draw the line as to what weapons are allowed? And if you are talking about 'true freedom loving', doesn't that mean you should be allowed to have all possible weapons? And while we're on the topic: don't you think a 'true freedom loving' government would allow its people to smoke some pot in their own basement?
Is there a limit to this? Nuclear weapons? Biochemical weapons? Armored divisions?
They should, what people do is their business not the Government or other people. However with Nuclear you can make a lot of boom, you can't do that with even a tank. BTW you can own a tank if you want in the US.
I know that is why no normal person would want to own one.Well, the first two, especially the second one, could be said to be intrinsic threats to others, thus violating the equal rights of others by their very existence. This isn't the case with most conventional weapons.
Uranium and plutonium are both moderately radioactive and chemically extremely toxic. Even outside of a functional nuclear weapon small quantities can poison huge numbers of people and contaminate areas for protracted periods of time. Biochemical weapons are even harder to store safely and even more indiscriminate.
I know that is why no normal person would want to own one.
Let me rephrase then, no logical thinking person would like to own one.Fitting standards of normality shouldn't be a requirement, nor abnormality a justification for restricting what people can do.
There should be more objective criteria.
Let me rephrase then, no logical thinking person would like to own one.
The right to own a firearm and keep it on your person is true freedom, any government who what to take the right of the people to defend themselves is not a freedom loving government. Same apply to knives.