General / Off-Topic is scotland leaving the UK?

They really aren't. They are just there to grab your attention and get you to read the article. If you rely on the headline for information, you'll get the wrong idea about half the time, as they tend to oversell things to a large degree.

Indeed. Headlines are almost always written by sub-editors, not by the author of the article. Quite often the headline will not reflect the whole article, and may well be completely misleading or sensational (aka clickbait... which existed way before clicks were a thing!).

Almost always worth ignoring, in other words.
 

Javert

Volunteer Moderator
Indeed. Headlines are almost always written by sub-editors, not by the author of the article. Quite often the headline will not reflect the whole article, and may well be completely misleading or sensational (aka clickbait... which existed way before clicks were a thing!).

Almost always worth ignoring, in other words.


Exclusive - Headlines are always completely correct!

A landmark study has provided the first evidence proving that newspaper and internet headlines are always completely correct. The study, conducted over a long period of time by a reputable agency, showed that in 96.4% of cases, newspaper headlines were right.

This news will be a bitter blow to Jeremy Corbyn, all left wingers, and all those who have complained needlessly about inaccurate news headlines.

blah blah blah lots more biased waffle for about half a page.....

The researchers explained the rigorous methodology behind their study:

"This study was designed to determine whether newspaper and online headlines are correct and right. As we all know, headlines are correct if they fulfill two criteria:
- Encourage people to click on them.
- Encourage people to buy this newspaper.
Based on this criteria, the vast majority of headlines were fully correct."

Some enemies of the people have tried to distract attention from this by asking whether the alignment of the headline with actual facts in the real world, or alignment with the content of the article below the headline, was studied.

"This aspect was not within our terms of reference - including this would have been a scandalous waste of money" stated a spokesperson.
 
let them have the referendum. though it cant happen before we leave EU.
the result will be the same. Scotland will stay with the uk.
I am prepared to place a bet on it to the tune of £1000.
I am really loving how much I have won, hope it keeps on rolling on.

SNP should buy a Scottish isle and declare it independent, issue solved.
 
Interesting discussion about GERS on BBC Radio Scotland yesterday morning. It was a 20 minute debate between Professor Richard Murphy and Kevin Hague, an amateur blogger who has for years been arguing that GERS figures show that an independent Scotland would be economically unviable.

It featured the following, quite startling, admission from Mr Hague.

Richard finished his piece by saying they can’t tell us what an independent Scotland’s finances would look like. That is, of course, absolutely true.

What the GERS figures do tell us is, historically, how do Scotland’s revenue and expenditure figures look as an integral part of the UK.

You said – and it’s a critical phrase – ‘the purpose for which it’s intended’. Nobody suggests that the GERS figures show what a future independent Scotland would look like.
 
Interesting isn't it, I'm surprised Richard didn't jump on it to be honest, seemed fairly crucial.

The entire debate is a fine example of the fallacy of false equivalence. An economics professor should never be made to debate with an amateur blogger in the first place. All opinions are not equal.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom