Development plans change so they can't say precisely which species will be added post-launch. You can play as much as you want and only get the dino DLC that you like.
Jurassic World Evolution 3 | Gameplay Trailer
- Thread starter Paul_Crowther
- Start date
Development plans change so they can't say precisely which species will be added post-launch. You can play as much as you want and only get the dino DLC that you like.
It is certain the maps will be bigger than the square maps in Jurassic World: Evolution 2. There is no telling how many species will be in Jurassic World: Evolution 3.
Is there an estimate of the new map size limit?
Yeah, but I want accurate counterparts to the Jurassic Park dinosaurs, like what we got with Sinosauropteryx (basically an accurate Compsognathus) and Utahraptor (a good paleo-accurate replacement for the film canon's raptors), to name a few. So maybe Oxalaia (for a paleo-accurate Spinosaurus representation), Sinosaurus/Dracovenator (for the paleo-accurate Dilophosaurus representation), Zhuchengtyrannus/Daspletosaurus (for the paleo-accurate Tyrannosaurus/Tarbosaurus representation), Adasaurus/Tsaagan (for the paleo-accurate Velociraptor representation), and Dromaeosaurus/Saurornitholestes (for the paleo-accurate Atrociraptor representation) would be nice starts.
Also, Dr. Wu is not always correct. In fact, visitors often (not always, but still) want more accurate animals as opposed to more teeth (I'm looking at you, Indominus rex).
Many dinos should have feathers for accurate representation. Maybe we can breed feathered variants of the dinos.
Last edited:
As Evolution Square said in her video, IGN confirmed since June 9 that there are "over 240" models, no doubt for males, females, and juveniles. 82 x 3 is 246. But what (surprisingly) nobody on Earth that I've seen myself has ever said is that doesn't make any sense.
Not every dinosaur has breeding. 75 of the 82 dinos do, which means 7 dinosaurs won't, reducing it to 225 models instead. So, it wouldn't make sense that those seven dinos will all have three models at launch. An educated guess that I've made is six of these are variants, which are only the Jurassic World trilogy and JWE variants, while the other that would make a seventh count is a species that doesn't. That makes it 243 models total, so that's still "over 240."
The dinosaurs I specifically include in this theory are: Allosaurus (JWE), Dimorphodon (2015 or 2022), Giganotosaurus (JWE), Dreadnoughtus (JWE), Iguanodon (JWE), and Parasaurolophus (2022, which isn’t a variant in JWE2 but something I do believe will be so in JWE3). That also means I don't think the Jurassic Park trilogy variants will have family units, because I don't think those will be in the game at launch based on what's known about the confirmed model count.
Last edited:
If they want to make it more realistic they should have male + female juvenile dinos. So 82 x 4 = 328 models.
they should make sauropods fight and also babies with babies of other species
I wanted to share an idea about the building limits on consoles like Xbox Series S and Series X in Jurassic World Evolution games.
In previous versions, there were hard limits on species and constructions to avoid crashes, but often players weren't warned before hitting these limits. This sometimes leads to unexpected crashes or game closures, which can be very frustrating—especially after investing hours building a park.
I think it would be great if the game included a real-time warning system that notifies players when their park is approaching the console’s performance limit. For example:
This kind of system would help players manage their parks better, save progress more carefully, and avoid losing progress due to sudden crashes.
Overall, a warning system would improve the player experience on consoles by making the limits clear, instead of abruptly stopping or crashing the game.
Thanks for reading, and I hope Frontier considers this feature for Jurassic World Evolution 3!