Let's Talk About Pronghorn

First, the name is Pronghorn, not Pronghorn Antelope. Pronghorns are in their own family and not closely related to either antelopes or goats. The name antelope was applied to them due to the physical similarities to African antelopes noted by early European explorers in North America. In fact, the pronghorn's closest living relatives are giraffes and okapis and they are included in the Giraffidae superfamily. This should be reflected in the Zoopedia entry for this species.
Second, the biome requirement for the pronghorn is incorrect. Currently, the pronghorn is listed as solely a North American grassland species. This is incorrect. The pronghorn should more properly be included in the NA desert, taiga and grassland biomes and their plant requirements should reflect this. Including them in the taiga and desert biomes would better reflect the species' range in North America, which extends from Canada to Mexico, from California to Oklahoma, encompassing much of the US portion of the Rocky Mountains, the deserts of the US Southwest, Baja California and Mexico, and the vast high deserts of the Great Basin.
Pronghorn are creatures of the sagebrush, yet in-game, sagebrush is currently an inappropriate plant for them. The Great Basin, often called the Sagebrush Sea, is one of the last true strongholds of the pronghorn, providing them winter food and sheltering their fawns. In my state, California, pronghorn are only found in the sagebrush, on the Modoc Plateau of the northeastern corner of the state.
Please properly classify these uniquely American ungulates as the desert and taiga dwellers that they are so that we can create appropriate, accurate habitats for them in-game.
 
They don't actually live in taiga, their range doesn't extend that far north. Desert should be added though.

I also don't have a problem with them being called pronghorn antelope, this is still a commonly used name, even in scientific literature.
 
They don't actually live in taiga, their range doesn't extend that far north. Desert should be added though.

I also don't have a problem with them being called pronghorn antelope, this is still a commonly used name, even in scientific literature.
The Taiga biome in the game includes temperate coniferous forests. That's why some animals like the Formosan black bear, red panda and giant panda have the tag.
 
The Taiga biome in the game includes temperate coniferous forests. That's why some animals like the Formosan black bear, red panda and giant panda have the tag.
Correct in real life, but Frontier's taiga biome, as seen by their world map, includes most of the Great Basin, the northern Rocky Mountains and Northern California. In fact, they have designated where I live in NorCal as taiga, when it most definitely is not. Including pronghorn in the taiga biome would allow them to tolerate plants like Ponderosa pine, white sage and diamondleaf willow, which are found in their real-world range.
 
The Taiga biome in the game includes temperate coniferous forests. That's why some animals like the Formosan black bear, red panda and giant panda have the tag.

Yeah, I've never liked this. I would rather they add a temperate coniferous biome (changing the current temperate to temperate deciduous) than introduce more inaccuracies. It would literally just be adjusting biome tags. I made a similar argument when there was a thread discussing adding taiga to both the giant panda and formosan black bear, it didn't seem to gain any traction. I think this past update did show that Frontier is interested in updating inaccuracies (eg. removing bear from koala, update IUCN status for capuchins), so I don't get why they would introduce more (adding the taiga tag to giant panda/formosan black bear). I suspect it is a misunderstanding, thinking that all coniferous forests = taiga.
 
I think this past update did show that Frontier is interested in updating inaccuracies (eg. removing bear from koala, update IUCN status for capuchins), so I don't get why they would introduce more (adding the taiga tag to giant panda/formosan black bear). I suspect it is a misunderstanding, thinking that all coniferous forests = taiga.
Didn't the Formosan Black Bear even have a Taiga Tag in the Beginning (maybe during Beta. I'm not sure if we already had it back then) which was then replaced by the Temperate Biome?
I think it even had a different Zoopedia Picture which showed it in a snow covered Forest
 
Didn't the Formosan Black Bear even have a Taiga Tag in the Beginning (maybe during Beta. I'm not sure if we already had it back then) which was then replaced by the Temperate Biome?
I think it even had a different Zoopedia Picture which showed it in a snow covered Forest

Yes, during the beta they indeed did have the snowy background on their Zoopedia profile, as well as Taiga and Temperate tags (Tropical was added later).

Source: https://youtu.be/xCl_n7qXFdE?t=201

The poor Formosan black bear did go through quite a few changes, I'm guessing the first one resulted from a subspecific confusion, meaning different departments had different ideas for which subspecies of Asiatic black bear to add, thus resulting in name, photo and biome discrepancies.

This was fixed after the beta, by the addition of the Tropical biome, but removal of Taiga was later reverted after user feedback, as they realized even the Formosan black bear of the subtropics in fact inhabits temperate montane and subalpine coniferous forests.
 
Back
Top Bottom