Gotta say I do find it a bit hypocritical you complain about posts "attacking the poster" then the very next post you're labelling people complainers and serial whingers.
Isn't that exactly what I pointed out you were doing earlier ?.
Gotta say I do find it a bit hypocritical you complain about posts "attacking the poster" then the very next post you're labelling people complainers and serial whingers.
How are you getting on with Frontier support?
How are you getting on with Frontier support?
I don't really agree. You will find a general consensus on right/wrong and it can be quantified that way.Well that first as an intrinsic value that can be calculated, the second is just an emotion that can never be quantified.
Try the 5:2 diet I've lost a similar amount since November.
In defense of anyone being confused. The thing is, seasons in terms of TV stuff is afaik an Americanism. In England at least (and I suspect UK in general) TV shows are aired in series.Your normal understanding of the word season is wrong. I know several TV series where a season doesn't air each year.
The trouble is forum discussion is so clouded in misunderstandings, tribalism, strawmen and dishonesty that I don't think that will work here.
So you are saying a personal opinion can be quantified as an absolute?I don't really agree. You will find a general consensus on right/wrong and it can be quantified that way.
The trouble is forum discussion is so clouded in misunderstandings, tribalism, strawmen and dishonesty that I don't think that will work here.
It is. Red Anders mentioned it earlier. Sometimes it's best to agree to disagree & just let Frontier sort it out with the concerned customers.
So you are saying a personal opinion can be quantified as an absolute?
So if I say a particular box is black, even though it is red, I can be right if I get enough to agree with me? Wow, in that case your arguments in favour of LEP refunds (or whatever you are going on about) are wrong, and if enough people agree with me it will prove I am right, you are wrong![]()
So you are saying a personal opinion can be quantified as an absolute?
No I think that's a silly example.So if I say a particular box is black, even though it is red, I can be right if I get enough to agree with me? Wow, in that case your arguments in favour of LEP refunds (or whatever you are going on about) are wrong, and if enough people agree with me it will prove I am right, you are wrong![]()
Fair enough.I give up, Bitstorm and Riverside you have won - congratulations. You both make statements then when challenged state you never made those statement or that you didn't mean it that way, or well lets just say I will acknowledge you two as far better trolls than I will ever hope to be.
I don't really agree. You will find a general consensus on right/wrong and it can be quantified that way.
So you are saying a personal opinion can be quantified as an absolute?
Well you've moved from "right/wrong" to "personal opinion" which aren't the same thing.
And you've just introduced the notion of "absolute".
So no I'm not saying I think personal opinion can be quantified as an absolute.
But I think the notion of right/wrong can be quantified yes, by consensus.
I think the correct response is it is an extremely small group of LEP owners whose past exploits have shown that even if they did get a definitive response from FD they would completely ignore it unless it was explicitly the exact response they wanted. The way some here are acting if FD did give a refund they would start complaining that they now want an LEP ….
It's true that both consumers and investors may buy a product, but an investor does so with the expectation that it will appreciate in value. A consumer purchases a product for use, based on an assessment of its utility compared to its cost, with any eventual appreciation being incidental to the purpose of the transaction.
I'd be interested to see how you feel someone could expect an LEP to appreciate in value over time. Note, getting more updates than the cost of the LEP is not appreciation, nor is getting more updates than you thought you'd get at the time the LEP was bought. In those circumstances the LEP will certainly represent better value to the individual than they anticipated it would at the time of purchase but that's because their expectation at the time of purchase was inaccurate, not because the item has any more intrinsic value that it did at that time. The LEP was always worth the cost of all potential future updates.
As for kickstarters, simply backing a kickstarter isn't in any way an investment in the company because there is no transfer of equity, in fact that is specifically prohibited by kickstarter's t&cs. All that you will ever receive is the defined benefit stated at the time the transaction was undertaken; it's essentially a group purchase scheme with a caveat that unless sufficient people agree to purchase in advance, the product will not be made available for sale to begin with. I know people think of it as investing but it isn't. It's a purchase. The fact that the product would not get made without those transactions does not make them investments.
You just conpletely made that up. You have no idea what these people are thinking, even if they spell it out directly and its certainly not that.
If anything they are giving an opportunity for frontier to addess the situation, ie not silence. Youd have a point if frontier did handle teh situation and they complained, but they havent.
The LEP gives lifetime access to the "free" of all the DLC of course.
That is good, my feeling is/was the 2020/21 DLC will be free, I do think it makes a lot of sense not to charge for it.
But given they've put paid-for in a trading statement means they are at least relatively sure that's the plan, it would have been very easy to leave out the paid-for part if there was still some uncertainty about it.