I mean, if I had MS subscription I might be annoyed finding out their pushing mibile games now because ".. don't you guys have smart phones?"
Just as an example. You have a Playstation, you have been playing every Call of Duty game when it comes out each year. Now you will (tbc) no longer be able to play a Call of Duty game simply because someone wants you to buy their machine rather than the one you have.What's wrong with it? You have to buy into a different platform now to play some AAA game? It's no different than the past exclusivity crap.
I was referring to the busness practices not having changed much. The exclusivity stuff is nothing new. And if you just ignore it it doesnt impact you.Just as an example. You have a Playstation, you have been playing every Call of Duty game when it comes out each year. Now you will (tbc) no longer be able to play a Call of Duty game simply because someone wants you to buy their machine rather than the one you have.
Your last two posts don't really make much sense to be honestYou doing OK?
But Diablo 4 is (tentatively) slated for release this year. Diablo 3 is available on PC, Xbox, Playstation and Switch. There is a very high possibility, that after people playing on all platforms have been following the development for the last couple of years that it will release on PC and Xbox.
Zenimax/Bethesda who Microsoft acquired last March.Diablo, CoD, skate boardoarding, Crash Bandicoot and a few others games are not my cup of tea. Zenimax/Bethesda has much better selection IMO.
Not till this post.Zenimax/Bethesda who Microsoft acquired last March.
![]()
Microsoft completes Bethesda acquisition, promises some Xbox and PC exclusives
Microsoft’s first-party studios list jumps to 23 with this deal.www.theverge.com
Are you seeing a pattern?
Microsoft agreed to buy Activision Blizzard in a $US68.7 billion ($96 billion) deal, uniting two of the biggest forces in video games to create the world’s third-biggest gaming company.
In its largest purchase ever, Microsoft will pay $US95 a share in cash for one of the most legendary gaming publishers, known for titles like Call of Duty and World of Warcraft but which is also grappling with a cultural upheaval over its treatment of women.
I thought that was EA.Well you can kiss any Activision games you liked goodbye. Any gaming IP Microsoft buys, it ruins.
I never played Warcraft so I don't care much about Blizzard.
![]()
Microsoft buys Activision Blizzard in $96b game deal
Microsoft will pay $US95 a share in cash for one of the most legendary gaming publishers, known for titles including Call of Duty and World of Warcraft.www.afr.com
Less gameplay, more gfx in a nutshell. Not what I am looking for. Also genres that just don't interest me much..
Whether they interest you or not isn't really the point. Buying studios that have established franchises that have had no restrictions on the platforms they've been available on for years, decades in some cases, and then restricting future titles to your own platform is poor form (I'm doing my best to stay within the rules).
I don't really care who the company doing it is. It just so happens that it's Microsoft, who have a track record and the capital to be able to afford it.
We are Microsoft, resistance is futile you will be assimilated![]()
".. don't you guys have smart phones?"
Lol no that isn't my solution, which I think would have been clear from my posts. Neither is it the same, but I've already explained why so it doesn't matter.I was referring to the busness practices not having changed much. The exclusivity stuff is nothing new. And if you just ignore it it doesnt impact you.
Is your solution "now I'm gonna have to buy an xbox"? That's no solution - it's just feeding the machine.
Wow, hadn't thought of that. You get a commission for launching a campaign that lowers the cost of acquisition and you're made. That would be high-grade story plot....
Especially if you devalue your company by allowing the sex-pest infestation to become public before acquisition.
....