Kotaku when?![]()
Ask your question in English and I'll give it a shot.
Kotaku when?![]()
Then you don't know FD obviously. They won't change their minds. Also overplaying impact this issue have actually doesn't help.
They might change minds in future.
I hope those of you who are defending the devs on this have thought this through, because once the supporters of the offline mode are gone with their refund (at least I hope a refund is still on the table), you'll be stuck between the devs who pushed the always online model on you on one side, and that growing part of the community who keeps creating new threads every week asking to pay for a monthly subscription on the other. God forbid if sales are disappointing and that were to happen at some point down the road, you'd better expect to face the same witty arguments you've been throwing at us all this time such as "they never promised it would be free, only said "it will be free" on Kickstarter", "you can't blame them, they really tried to keep it free but in the end had to change the model", "stop whining everyone can afford to pay $15 a month", "you're so entitled for expecting to play online without paying for a subscription" and of course the good ol' "You want the game to remain free, even if that would make it worse?" from the team. As unlikely a possibility as this might look right now, keep in mind that cancelling the offline mode looked just as unlikely to some us a few days ago.
A quick question for anyone who saw Elite Dangerous being demoed at a games expo / event like EGX - were those demo stations just running tutorial missions, or were they networked? Just wondering whether Frontier took along a local server to power those shows, as I can't imagine many exhibition centres being able to provide stable internet access for that number of machines.
I try to explain it often before in this thread but they want listen.I hope those of you who are defending the devs on this have thought this through, because once the supporters of the offline mode are gone with their refund (at least I hope a refund is still on the table), you'll be stuck between the devs who pushed the always online model on you on one side, and that growing part of the community who keeps creating new threads every week asking to pay for a monthly subscription on the other. God forbid if sales are disappointing and that were to happen at some point down the road, you'd better expect to face the same witty arguments you've been throwing at us all this time such as "they never promised it would be free, only said "it will be free" on Kickstarter", "you can't blame them, they really tried to keep it free but in the end had to change the model", "stop whining everyone can afford to pay $15 a month", "you're so entitled for expecting to play online without paying for a subscription" and of course the good ol' "You want the game to remain free, even if that would make it worse?" from the team. As unlikely a possibility as this might look right now, keep in mind that cancelling the offline mode looked just as unlikely to some us a few days ago.
Ask your question in English and I'll give it a shot.
<snip>
Kotaku when?![]()
I know they had a 'server machine' at some of them, can't speak for all though.
You promised to leave the thread!
......The joystick got here just days before NL49 (that's what I'm calling newsletter #49 now, I hope it catches on, I hope you remember it)......
You promised to leave the thread!
I know they had a 'server machine' at some of them, can't speak for all though.
Well Said! Questions need to be asked.I hope those of you who are defending the devs on this have thought this through, because once the supporters of the offline mode are gone with their refund (at least I hope a refund is still on the table), you'll be stuck between the devs who pushed the always online model on you on one side, and that growing part of the community who keeps creating new threads every week asking to pay for a monthly subscription on the other. God forbid if sales are disappointing and that were to happen at some point down the road, you'd better expect to face the same witty arguments you've been throwing at us all this time such as "they never promised it would be free, only said "it will be free" on Kickstarter", "you can't blame them, they really tried to keep it free but in the end had to change the model", "stop whining everyone can afford to pay $15 a month", "you're so entitled for expecting to play online without paying for a subscription" and of course the good ol' "You want the game to remain free, even if that would make it worse?" from the team. As unlikely a possibility as this might look right now, keep in mind that cancelling the offline mode looked just as unlikely to some us a few days ago.
I have no idea what kotaku is
This thread is completely stupid.
Whichever side of the debate you fall on, nothing constructive is being said (in anything resembling civil conversation) and no new points are being made.
Let it die. It is bad for the community and the game.
The decision has been made. I'm personally gutted, but getting hysterical on the internet isn't going to change anything.
Edit: Aware of the irony of calling for a thread to die and then contributing to it...
The decision has been made. I'm personally gutted, but getting hysterical on the internet isn't going to change anything.
So, an AWS server isn't really needed, if you're correct...