Now I know this game is real....

Yes don't know my far side moon geography -could have a stab at nearside but looks like the moon has an accurate mapping.
 
Does everyone have to be such a grumpy guts and just not accept that ED creates very nice space shots - very similar to real ones (with artistic license)

Geezo

There was no grumpyness or malice intended. Just telling it how it is. Yes, Elite Dangerous has been given an amazing glimpse of whats out there in it's accuracy, and touched up for players to consume.

Shok.
 
It looks good in isolation - but I hope FD take that photo and analyse what they need to do to make the planet visuals match reality
 
The one with no stars is real, since in free space, you cannot see them.

Shok.

You can if your windshield augments it's opacity in various areas in order to allow you to view them. In elite, Windshields are smart, can vary and alter wavelengths passing through them. This is how you don't cook near the sun, but instead see it in detail.

Windshield... it's not really a windshield in space though is it...
 
You can if your windshield augments it's opacity in various areas in order to allow you to view them. In elite, Windshields are smart, can vary and alter wavelengths passing through them. This is how you don't cook near the sun, but instead see it in detail.

Windshield... it's not really a windshield in space though is it...

The real reason we have smart canopy glass in ED is that nobody has a monitor with brightness that will go high enough to properly represent getting that close to a star.
 
You can if your windshield augments it's opacity in various areas in order to allow you to view them. In elite, Windshields are smart, can vary and alter wavelengths passing through them. This is how you don't cook near the sun, but instead see it in detail.

Windshield... it's not really a windshield in space though is it...

What happens when your canopy gets blown when you're near a star?
 
When you take pictures of objects in space the exposure time is too short. Moon earth sun etc are way way brighter than the stars and the camera doesn't catch enough light at the sensitivity to make good shots on the earth and moon.

The level of sensitivity required to balance that image would make the moon and earth balls of bright white light. Human eyes are awesome, and can see the difference. We're really good at that actually, dealing with contrasting light levels. Within reason of course. I think I read somewhere that looking at earth or the moon full on will give similar results due to the amount of light reflected, but if you look away, stars!
 
Last edited:
Where is this puny planet called Earth? I will hyperspace in & destroy all of its inhabitants with my Python when i have the co-ordinates MHuuwwwHaaHhaaHa
 
Back
Top Bottom