I'm very cautious (and proud) - when I'm in a Cobra I can be reasonably sure that I'm safe from hostile CMDRs but I'm not so confident when flying an Asp.
But now that I'm flying an Asp again I'll have to stick with it - I knew this would happen - the view is so much better and the longer jump range has already made a big difference to how I'm flying. I'm heading off in the direction of HIP 26212 to chase that Rocky/CFT and see the sights along the way.
I've hit on an idea for a long-term project - couple of ideas, really. I'm still looking at making a simplified map with the constellations on it (more accurately, the directions of the constellations relative to Sol) - just playing for this short time it's great knowing where Orion (etc.) is relative to Sol in an absolute, x,y,z sense and not the distorted sort of picture we get from being on a planet that's spinning on a different plane so everything goes all over the place. Like if you look at the Milky Way on a chart of the night sky it's bent round in loops instead of a straight line. So previously if someone said "Sco/Cen association" I'd think "er, ok..." and now I think "ah, Scorpius and Centaurus, that's directly in towards the galactic centre, I actually know where that is!"
The other part of the idea was to go round the constellations of the Zodiac (and then eventually all the other 70-odd constellations) visiting all the major named stars... er, well, I went round Aquarius, and that took long enough. But I think it'll be a good way to get to Elite explorer.

The good thing is that there's always some stars that are close to inhabited space, or inhabited themselves, so you're not ever going too far from home. Obviously the Zodiac constellations go round in an off-galactic-plane arc.
I thought of a few more planets I'm looking for - ones which are actually in the progress of terraforming, and ones which have been terraformed. I've seen "terraforming in progress" planets in systems where there's no map data but I don't know whether there'll be any terraformed ones.
Another thing I'm doing is trying to work out the relationship between atmosphere type, density and temperature - not that it has any great practical value that I can see. It appears that the different types of atmosphere make a big difference to the amount of extra heat, as you'd expect. It's cool that it's modeled.