Is gud cat
Is gud cat
But that depends- CGs are optional to undertake, and FD did say they wanted something for everyone- while not every CG should be open it would be nice to have one or two that offer something different.
Yes CG's are optional but so are mode choice and PVP.
The people who want to do PVP are already doing it. The people who want to try PVP have already tried it.
Blaze your own trail, like everyone else can.
It's not about personal preference though, it's about availability.
If it was open only, you'd get less of a game, but I guess you're on pc and don't have to pay a premium to play open. Absolutely no consideration for other players whatsoever. Again. If people want open only, why can't they go play WoW or eveonline? I'm sure they'd be welcomed there (for 5 minutes then the bleating gets really irritating)
on a long desert highway cool wind in my hair.......At least the ones with pivotal decisions.
You know multiquote is a thing?Or perhaps you pay, or wait for the next CG? Is it that much of a loss to wait two weeks?
You know multiquote is a thing?Or perhaps you pay, or wait for the next CG? Is it that much of a loss to wait two weeks?
You know multiquote is a thing?
You know multiquote is a thing?
Also it's a long tradition here to rant first and take a look at features later...
Multiquote Only Power Play anyone?I hate multiquoting as my posts get massive and I always format them wrong.
Multiquote Only Power Play anyone?![]()
Which is jibberish- your answer is because people are already doing it can't be a CG- eh?
I could apply that to anything - trading, exploring, collecting. CGs are supposed to take ED activities and provide an event around them. An Open CG can be more than blowing something up- it can be used for roleplay for example. The Titan CG was pirating.
It applies to everything it's all optional. Accept that and stop sweating other peoples choices.
Personally I choose open but very rarely bother with PVP. I don't mind whatever choices you make it's between you and your personal subjective preferences.
They still wouldn't like it. It's all about having more targets because they've lost the ones they had, and they'd soon lose the new ones too.How about if open-only players get their wish, but have to pay for the extra server themselves? On a monthly basis, 20 quid per player? That would shut them up.
Events that are pivotal in the game should actually be solo only - as that way each player has exactly the same influence as every other - think about it
Fluff events could be staged as open only as that way it will attract the players who just wish to play for fun.
Which makes no sense, because I'm arguing for a choice while you are arguing against choice- in this case having an open CG. People can choose themselves to do it or not, just as they choose to do anything in the game.
Since a CG is a self contained scenario, those who take part want to do it.
It makes some sense that event 'A' can determine the direction of 'B', and so on, just because there will be a feeling of continuity and the events would be much more 'believable' because of this - it is a good idea!And I'd partially actually agree with that- Arthur hinted that all the CGs influence the next but its not a singular chain. For example, FD could spin up factional war between pirate clans that has consequences but is self contained.
With the instancing and stability issues we've had in our squad, I'd take a subscription for a dedicated open server right now.How about if open-only players get their wish, but have to pay for the extra server themselves? On a monthly basis, 20 quid per player? That would shut them up.