All around weird decisions in this pack. Coyote but no coati, adding a rhea but nor a mara, making a saki (not complaining) instead of the howler which is the most requested NWM.But Minecraft has those items and no warnings?!
(The text below is not an answer to your post, Aardvark, just a general thought.)
I'm quite surprised to read a couple of extreme reactions to this pack. It didn't feel quite controversial to me, honestly. More like a reasonable mid-tier pack. The biggest flaw is the omission of the top requested animal from the meta wishlist. It's painful, I got it, and I'm sad about it too (and about Mara!). Maybe this decision was some kind of weird mistake? Or was it harder to make a good model of it because of climbing? Or is this species unknown to the more casual PZ players? But it must be better known than the bush dogs or saki? I have a feeling we will get this animal at some point. Fingers crossed!
And yes, some animals in this DLC are very similar to what we already have (flamingo, bighorn), and in general, the pack is missing the wow factor. But, to be fair, some of our wishes were answered: we got two birds and a monkey in one pack and more SA animals in general. And I think it's not mentioned often enough: the ocelot looks awesome. I can't find a flaw in the model; perhaps it's the most realistic-looking cat in the game.
What makes me sad is that there is no indication of a free update or any new plants. Annoyingly, among the new scenery items, they listed paper flowers. Why add paper flowers but no real ones? That seems like a weird decision on their side.![]()
Honestly by just making this full on Latinoamérica and replacing the coyote and bighorn with coati and mara and this pack elevates to top tier. Of course you could also changed the flamingo for something more unique like the roseate spoonbill or the Scarlet ibis and there you have a top Quality DLC.