∞ probes?

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
So looking at that poll stigbob would you be happy with the middle option. Infinite probes as shown in the video with options to craft improved ones with say double coverage ... That way those who refuse to craft are covered and also you will always be able to scan systems even if you run out.
Because to me what that poll is saying is that is what the majority would like.

Yep, its the one I voted for.
 
Oooh how do you do get those stats, I've had to write scripts to do that previously.

When you're counting sheep, do you add up the number of legs and then divide by 4? :p

If you want the stat's for who's posted in a thread, just click on the number, next to a thread, where it says "[x] Replies". ;)

67no7p.jpg
 
Finite wasn't on there? Do you have reading comprehension problems?

Read the poll again. It's literally there in black and white.

Seriously this is why polls aren't permitted on the forums, people who create them or people who vote on them (one of the two), either don't have a clue or have an agenda. The results then get twisted and misrepresented (despite the options being very clear) into something else, just to suit people's own arguments.

And this is putting aside in this case it's people voting on something they haven't even tried yet. [rolleyes]


Look, craftable means craftable, finite means finite. Craftable is a subset of finite, they are not the same.

You can have finite without craftable. The last 10-20+ pages weve literally been talking about finite non-craftable solutions for probes.

The scooping mechanism for example.

If you're conflating the two it's probably worth thinking about the reasons WHY people object to craftable and if that necessarily must apply to finite, you'll find the answer is no. Hence the discussion.
 
Last edited:
Why are you guys still arguing, I solved this days ago while on holiday.

Ever wondered why scanners have so much mass?
Probes are synthesised on demand using fuel (which all explorers refill by scooping stars) and a a couple of grams of material held in the scanners of these huge ships we fly making them unlimited or at least a million probes before you have to replace your Scanners.

This material is replenished as part of the module repair process and your scanner will fail before you run out of usable probe mass.

Thank me later
 
Read the poll again. It's literally there in black and white.

Indeed it is! Why, the preface to the poll is right there in black and white too - if you read and comprehend it! Here's the preface...

The new exploration mechanics in Chapter Four require probes to map the planetary surface. In order to make this very accessible for everyone, and to reduce the grind, Frontier have opted to make probes an infinite resource. This means there will be no down time to "craft probes" during exploration. However, some people feel this goes against realism, and would therefore prefer probes to be a finite resource.

Then the poll options.

I mean, it takes a particular kind of special not to be able to see the 'finite' option in that poll.
 
I mean, it takes a particular kind of special not to be able to see the 'finite' option in that poll.


This poll? It literally asks you to vote for "infinite" or "craftable".

mXxjk7D.png


90% have an infinite probe in the solution, 73% have a craftable probe in the solution.

A combined non-infinite and non-craftable solution is possible, and for me I think might even offer the best implementation for probes. (let's scoop gas giants!)

And is not represented in that poll.

And it's what we were talking about some odd pages back before the thread crapping.
 
Last edited:
And when you take the preface to the poll into account - which apparently you are refusing to do - the meaning of the word "craftable" becomes perfectly clear to anyone who isn't deliberately trying to deny it or who doesn't have comprehension problems.

Yes now in hindsight you can see a mismatch between the description and the options. Did many people read that blurb, or just go with the options? I'm guessing a low percentage read that (it is a guess).

All I can really say is the options as written offer a choice between infinite and/or craftable.

You can say the options were badly written but that's what they said at the time people voted.

It is literally (as in LITERALLY) a poll between infinite and/or craftable.


But either way I'm not massively bothered, it's not me who keeps waving it around as though it's some ruling from on high, in an attempt to stop discussion.

I've always said I think the poll isn't worth much, given no-one's tried exploration yet.
 
Last edited:
Yes now in hindsight you can see a mismatch between the description and the options. Did many people read that blurb, or just go with the options? I'm guessing a low percentage read that (it is a guess).

All I can really say is the options as written offer a choice between infinite and/or craftable.

You can say the options were badly written but that's what they said at the time people voted.

It is literally (as in LITERALLY) a poll between infinite and craftable.


But either way I'm not massively bothered, I've always said I think the poll isn't worth much anyway, given no-one's tried exploration yet.

Context is important in that poll craftable means finite.
 
So Obsidian Ant's poll essentially this:
A) slow probes <-- aka one
B) slow probes and all the fast probes you want to pay for <-- aka both
C) all the fast probes you want to pay for <-- aka the other

Is it any surprise at all that given the choice of one, the other or both that the most people chose both?

That's not a choice, that's human nature!

It wasn't an immersion vs grind choice people were making in this poll! I was just a shopping experience!

:D
 
Last edited:
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom