I've traded a lot since release and its getting REALLY boring after some time (jump from L7 to another trading ship takes much more time) the next target was python now i don't have "next" target ship...
Python will now be destroyable by sidewinders
Anaconda is also too vulnerable to small ships
Orca and Federeal Dropship is useless
L9 is obsolette i dont need so much money
So ill buy Imperial Clipper or ASP fit it and ill be able to get credits for this in L7 cause there's no need to upgrade to larger ships...
If I were to spend time (loads of it) earning money for modules and rebuy costs i want to get something that isn't destroyable by small ship
Tr y hitting a Car with a bike (Python/Anaconda = Car, Viper, Cobra = bike in terms of size and costs) THESE ships should be nearly undestroyable for 1 fighter ship...
There were many changes since betas(which i bought) but it's first time i'm regreting money I paid for this game...
And again i don't have python nor the money needed to buy and outfit it best i can get with my money is fully equipped ASP or Cobra, I trade a lot and for 2 days of playing trader i'm playing 1-2 days doing missions from BB or little bit PVP in Cobra or Viper and i don't have probs attacking players in pythons most of them even doesn't know how to fight and are like sitting ducks when they come to warzones...
So mr Mike maybe you should sit and REBALANCE ALL once again ? so the ships costing loads of money will be worth it ? It clearly looks like you don't have much experience in this cause all ballance is done like " it should be 1.5 stronger than this etc"
example ? burst lasers its better having pulse or beam cause bursts are poor try to get middle between pulse and beams
next example TWO Class 1 beams do more damage than ONE Class 2 Beam (difference in damage done to the same ship betwen Class 1 and Class 2 weapon is around 1.5, costs ? 6 times more)
WHOLE GAME IS VERY POORLY BALANCED and there shouldnt be random nerfs/changes like this! thats what i mean to say if someone don't want to read/understand what i wrote above
+1
Totally agree. Maybe there is more people who thinking this way.
You answered to me that I should buy my own Python but it is too expensive implying that I can't. I call it counting others people credits. Which is bad behaviour at least as I see it.
If you want talking about something is good to know something about it.
You will know something about playing Python when you will get one.
If you want to get one you will need cash.
This is simple implication, not counting in pocket.... so then:
If you dont have cash, you dont have python, and you do not know are you talking about, but still taking.
Last edited: