Reducing distance costs by 50

Sweet, now          on all sides are paraphrasing me why I voted a delayed transfer and telling me I'm wrong. But avoiding addressing those arguments in the meantime.

Right, why am I think the adjustments FD made make sense. I voted delay because it would be the cheaper option. New players who are looking go get settled find a system they like at some point but by then could have their fleet dispersed all over the bubble. Using a cheaper transfer they at least could resettle their fleet. Something I would have liked very much when I was in that situation. I had 2 other reasons, but it's clear that many arguing here have issues when needing to absorb a single argument, so I'll leave it at that one.

This is still perfectly valid as far as I can see. Now until I see a counter argument to that, anyone telling me I don't have an argument in favour of delayed, or in favour of a price reduction can Keep It Stupid Simpleton my furry little butt :)

Well Ziggy, your "argument" doesn't hold water. The OP's issue is that because the price goes down, the time will go down. Your argument seams to be a guess that is the time goes down, the price will go up, just the opposite.
 
Well Ziggy, your "argument" doesn't hold water. The OP's issue is that because the price goes down, the time will go down. Your argument seams to be a guess that is the time goes down, the price will go up, just the opposite.

My argument seems to be? I wasn't reacting to OPs post there, but rather some comments I read later on who told me I had no argument for delayed, or I'm proven wrong now we have it. And I was comparing delayed vs instant. Not delayed vs less delayed.

Edit: just noticed the quotation marks around argument. Christ that was clever.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom