It's sad to see where its all going. "Blaze your own trail!", oh wait you cant heres a ban from FD carebears. No fun allowed.
I'm a carebear. Mostly
And i'm quite outraged if FD really served bans for the "emergent" gameplay.
It's sad to see where its all going. "Blaze your own trail!", oh wait you cant heres a ban from FD carebears. No fun allowed.
But you can get them back by docking with a Sidey and then going boom and taking out one of their docking pads.True... blowing them up with massively overpowered ships is much more fun, isn't it...
I still think Self Destruct is a valid move. If you're a newbie, you don't exactly have much to lose.
Sure it's easy to escape this kind of situation when you know the game a little bit (or are not naive),
Just think, some of these adults caught up in this scam have internet access and a credit/debit card. I think slave mining is the least of their worries.
Just think, some of these adults caught up in this scam have internet access and a credit/debit card. I think slave mining is the least of their worries.
The 'issue' with new players being the prime 'ship go boom' entertainment for a minority of the playerbase has been (allegedly) going on since just after launch... Nothing is done about it as it appears that 'emergent gameplay', no matter how one-sided it might be, is accepted as 'good' gameplay by Frontier. (Think about it, had this not been so we would have separate PvP & PvE modes already)But you can get them back by docking with a Sidey and then going boom and taking out one of their docking pads.
However, I play solo so it's not an issue for me.
I don't like MP since there are too many douchbags who fly OP ships and love to gank players in easy to kill ships "because they can". Put them against someone of equal strength and they run like scared chickens. Had enough of that in Eve Online.
Yeah, so?Or have used google once in your lifetime. Or know someone else who has used google once in their lifetime, like a parent maybe. Whilst playing a computer game, which does idicate that you might be minimally tech-savvy.
They're probably the ones you read about in the Daily Star who are getting evicted because their kid 'accidentally' spent thirteen grand on batman costumes in Fortnight and now it's all Somebody Else's Fault TM.
that might deter people from taking new players prisoner.
They don't have enough credits to buy an IQ yet.Or have used google once in your lifetime. Or know someone else who has used google once in their lifetime, like a parent maybe. Whilst playing a computer game, which does indicate that you might be minimally tech-savvy.
Of course, that also leaves the issue of whether if brains were dynamite, would you have enough to blow your hat off, which I suspect is the root cause of the problem and one that's far less easy to legislate against.
Nah. Unless you can bring in a few catchwords like "systemic racism" and such, you're unlikely to catch the eye of the likes of Polygon and Kotaku.Sorry I haven't read the entire thread so maybe already covered, but is this a bad time to bring up the "free Anacondas @Hutton" thingy?
Allegedly, I am trying my alleged best to incorporate 'allegedly' into most of my alleged berating of the allegegedly insane genius of this alleged scammer, allegedly...Thread needs more 'allegedly'.
Allegedly.(Izzat OK?)
Emergent does not equal one player exploiting another, nor the actions of other players to undo the damage.
Emergent is all the FC trips to Colonia and Sag A and Rackhams Peak and all the rest that loads of 'naive' people are trusting to be true.
Emergent does not mean an adult realising they are talking to a child and continuing the behaviour, and if they didnt realise they were talking to a 7yo then maybe they are the ones who need supervising online, or locking away from other people.
Banning to Solo is a much more permanent and effective solution though. Both as a deterrent to others and a hard stop to that behaviour from people who cant be trusted in the first place.
Overall liking the hysterical faux-outrage that cheaters got banned though and the attempts to build straw-men all over. soo much salt over a couple of cheaters who are self-publicising that they targeted a child and dont see it as wrong. Besides theyve lost nothing but a ship as they always say. Its just a game theres nothing important to lose so they say....
100%, if you want to be exact.I'd stick with 'second rate reporting'
Sums up a good % of journalism