Well, humanity was always the most capable killer of humanity, no virus can ever compete with the billions of people who killed each other through out the history. 
Still Malaria.Well, humanity was always the most capable killer of humanity, no virus can ever compete with the billions of people who killed each other through out the history.![]()
Yes, malaria is a strong contender for the gold medal. But it's in Africa so western society kind of doesn't care. Sad truth.Still Malaria.
Mankind is probably behind this one, so mankind is still in the running for the award.Well, humanity was always the most capable killer of humanity, no virus can ever compete with the billions of people who killed each other through out the history.![]()
Yes, as per the article I've posted earlier - it's very probably man-made and man-let-loose.Mankind is probably behind this one, so mankind is still in the running for the award.
China now has something to gain by letting it spread internationally.
And once it gets to his doorstep, methinks the story may not be so good as in a totalitarian centrally controlled country with an army administered health service (where there are no idiots drinking bleach.) If China can't control it, nowhere can.
We can project that the first country to gain population immunity will be China, that the centrally controlled recovery will be in China, and that when the rest of the industrial world is crippled and looking to try to cope, the resident expertise will be in China.
I fear that we shall measure Mr Ross' words soon. And he himself may be measuring his own lack of immunity. He can thank his own intelligence for that.
Yeah, but some of us would like to enjoy the whole run before that.Meh
Everybody dies
WW1 estimated 20 million deaths. !918-1920 Spanish flu, estimated, between 50 & 100 million deaths.Well, humanity was always the most capable killer of humanity, no virus can ever compete with the billions of people who killed each other through out the history.![]()
Yes, short term, diseases can win. But during history of warfare, humans killed billions of other humans.WW1 estimated 20 million deaths. !918-1920 Spanish flu, estimated, between 50 & 100 million deaths.
Yes, short term, diseases can win. But during history of warfare, humans killed billions of other humans.
Some year or two ago in a thread about... I don't know, something that needed proving... I actually spent about an hour doing a bodycount (I think it was about proving that 20th century was the most peaceful century in human history, now that I think about it).Did you mean with cigarettes? ( of course not, /jk)
WW1 & 2 =< 50 million deaths.
Cigarettes > 100 million last century.
All of warfare would be a considerable number, certainly.
Back in the 1500's, news of the English attack pending against Puerto Rico reached the defending governer. Reknowned Englishmen Admirals Drake and Hawkins had planned to land out of gun range, and lead the marines on a jungle assault. The governor is reported to have shrugged and remarked that he had Admiral Yellow Fever and General Malaria on his side.
Hawkins and Drake both died of disease, never lived to see home. True story.
WW1 & 2 =< 50 million deaths.
Cigarettes > 100 million last century.
A virus doesn't survive for that long outside its host. In some cases up to 24 hours, but typically it won't survive more than half an hour. Another thing worth noting is that even though you could potentially get infected by one single virus, the amount of virus you're infected with also will have some effect on whether you get ill or not, because your immune system should be able to cope with smaller infections.
Personally I normally get a little tense in crowded places when people don't respect my "private sphere" with a radius of several meters, but these days I get all the space I want. If not, then a small cough quickly clears the area![]()