Will they be compatible with Dimorphodon?
Species Field Guide - Pteranodon
- Thread starter Jens Erik
- Start date
Then will be have water effects like splashes. It would be rare to see an aquatic reptile swim without the water moving.
They did pretty much have the same philosophy with Planet Zoo, having animals similar to ones already in base game (sizes were changed up for two of them)
Also, while most don't care about Archaeornithomimus, if it wasn't in the first game, people would still be asking for it among the other canon stuff.
JWE1's deluxe was entirely canon related species, if that continues with JWE2's deluxe, it's not likely to be too exciting for most people (things like Hadrosaurus, Segisaurus & Tianchisaurus would have high chances)
I think it'd be quite the bit of torture if they were incompatible, considering the mixed exhibit from the movie is the first thing people would want to make.
Like skins from the classic trilogy for dinos that already exist? And maybe more, like for the pteranodons?
the design of the pteranodons of JP3 (as in JWE1) will it also be available ?
Will you be able to put Dinosaurs in the aviaries along side any pterosaurs? Also will we be able to have the shape of the Pteranodons be the JP/// or TLWJP models? If not, we would love to see that in the future!
It's a canon mention, Claire mentions it as a name she had to learn to say in JW (it's small, but that wouldn't stop the flow of suggestions, given Nipponosaurus was on the holoscape prop and that got suggested a few times).
A lot of the remaining canon related stuff is fragmentary enough that you could pretty much do anything design wise (not that being largely complete has stopped them before).
Still don't see how being mentioned by name makes it any more canon than anything else... or why that alone should make it a priority.
Last edited:
Nipponosaurus actually sounds interesting, I was looking for a small Hadrosaurid a long time, never found it, but this one is just that! Thanks for the mention lol!
People asking for Archaeornithomimus are just strange in my opinion, who wants that Struthiomimus clone?
For those dinosaurs I think Struthiomimus (smaller) and Gallimimus (larger) are enough, no need for those clones, you can also change the name of Struthiomimus into Archaeo to get the same effect.
Ornithomimus would even be better than Archaeo...
I only remember Archaeo from an novel called DINOSAURS! back in the 90ties, it was on the frond page for some bizarre reason...
People asking for Archaeornithomimus are just strange in my opinion, who wants that Struthiomimus clone?
For those dinosaurs I think Struthiomimus (smaller) and Gallimimus (larger) are enough, no need for those clones, you can also change the name of Struthiomimus into Archaeo to get the same effect.
Ornithomimus would even be better than Archaeo...
I only remember Archaeo from an novel called DINOSAURS! back in the 90ties, it was on the frond page for some bizarre reason...
Uhh... what?! Dude... Ornithomimus and Struthiomimus are barely any different... yet Ornithomimus would be a better pick over Archaeornithomimus? ...that's some very strange logic you got there...
Novel? Are you sure you're not thinking about the magazine series? Each issue featured a different dinosaur on the cover and yes Archaeornithomimus was one of them... like number 38 or something... or was it Dromiceiomimus? I don't recall the specific one actually... I actually still have the complete set lying around somewhere--we'll, all the ones released in my area... apparently there were 103 issues in all...
Last edited:
Or the Pteranodons from TLW?
You can house multiple species of flying reptiles inside an Aviary, so you can try to put them together.
At least Ornithomimus has a name I can somewhat pronounce, if we really NEED (I said I want just two) three species of these dinosaurs, I prefer the one with the easier name over the one with the horrid-too-long-name. Also in the old books and magazines the Ornithomimius had VERY beautiful colors, so I always remember it out of nostalgica, the Archeolotalmimiusboringimus never appeared in any of my books, and in the DINOSAUR magazine it looked horrible boring.
And yes it were magazines, and there were only 52 parts in the Netherlands, in America they continued to the 100, not here in the Netherlands. Did Ankylosaurus finally get a profile page? I was missing it, same with some others...
Interesting. I thought they would hunt each other like crazy.
Archaeornithomimus is literally just Ornithomimus with an Ar-kay in front of it. I dont see why we cant have 4 Ornithomimids
Erm... okay then. If you're gonna use nostalgia and fanboyism to justify your position then... well... I can't really help with that...
I don't recall to be honest... to be fair, they stopped releasing the magazine in my area too... actually, I think it was around 52 they cut it off here too...
Well, they were depicted as co-existing in Jurassic World... and of course in real life they had very different ecological niches and diets--one was a piscivore, the other ate small animals--so they probably wouldn't be bothered by each other's presence.
I do kind of agree that Archeornithomimus is a bit pointless; it's a bit too similar to Struthiomimus and Gallimimus. That said, there are some really interesting Ornithomimids that haven't been added yet; Pelecanimimus is primitive and has interesting head features... and of course, Deinocheirus is pretty epic... and now that we know what it actually looks like, it's even more epic.
Were they actually depicted as co-existing?
I'm not using fanboyism at all, because I don't want Archeablablamimus or Ornithomimus in the game, I think Struthiomimus and Gallimimus are enough, then add the small Pelecanimimus and the giant Deinocheirus and I'm good, but if I had to choose between the Archeabla and Ornithomimus, I would go with Ornithomimus, the lesser evil of the two for me.
That's what it looked like... they were clearly together in the same room when the Indominus broke in.