Never start with the head, the victim gets all fuzzy.
State of the Game
- Thread starter Fuglydog53
- Start date
Well, you settled the issue - isn't that what diplomacy is all about?
FTFY
Back home we called it Red Sauce.
yeah they're meant for use in asutralia, so the stuff doesn't run out of the bottle in the store
As I mentioned indirectly:
credit, where credit's due.
Well, we totally flunked with getting to 1000 before lunch. I'm beginning to think it will stretch into tomorrow at this rate!
Indeed. Also, I throw a grenade to make diversion first, so I'm a stealthy diplomat.
I learned that trick a few days ago from a fellow forum poster.
The good thing is: Somewhere in the world it will always be before lunch, no matter how long we take....
Principles of Mathematical Logic is the 1950[1] American translation of the 1938 second edition[2] of David Hilbert's and Wilhelm Ackermann's classic text Grundzüge der theoretischen Logik,[3] on elementary mathematical logic. The 1928 first edition thereof is considered the first elementary text clearly grounded in the formalism now known as first-order logic (FOL). Hilbert and Ackermann also formalized FOL in a way that subsequently achieved canonical status. FOL is now a core formalism of mathematical logic, and is presupposed by contemporary treatments of Peano arithmetic and nearly all treatments of axiomatic set theory.
The 1928 edition included a clear statement of the Entscheidungsproblem (decision problem) for FOL, and also asked whether that logic was complete (i.e., whether all semantic truths of FOL were theorems derivable from the FOL axioms and rules). The former problem was answered in the negative first by Alonzo Church and independently by Alan Turing in 1936. The latter was answered affirmatively by Kurt Gödel in 1929.
In its description of set theory, mention is made of Russell's paradox and the Liar paradox (page 145). Contemporary notation for logic owes more to this text than it does to the notation of Principia Mathematica, long popular in the English speaking world.
The 1928 edition included a clear statement of the Entscheidungsproblem (decision problem) for FOL, and also asked whether that logic was complete (i.e., whether all semantic truths of FOL were theorems derivable from the FOL axioms and rules). The former problem was answered in the negative first by Alonzo Church and independently by Alan Turing in 1936. The latter was answered affirmatively by Kurt Gödel in 1929.
In its description of set theory, mention is made of Russell's paradox and the Liar paradox (page 145). Contemporary notation for logic owes more to this text than it does to the notation of Principia Mathematica, long popular in the English speaking world.
I wonder if the closer we get to 1000 pages, the slower time will pass - so that the thread never actually reaches 1000, but we get stuck here, on the event horizon!!!
I tried my averagest. Sorry it didn't work.
But in other parts it is already tomorrow and we have failed miserably
Try nuclear diplomacy.
As a practical implementation of quantum scale processes,
it frees you from every possible future negotiation effort with anyone in the AOE.
Even about topics that are not existing on your (current point of) spacetime.
This question was already answered I fear - there is this pesky SC Thread v12 with 27k answers we still have to beat....
like spreading the news - Erie is in the house.
So you think the mass of the posts would create gravitational time dilation?
If yes, then Earth itself would eventually be swallowed by the black hole this thread creates
Same as that game, this thread is underdelivering.