Keep in mind you're only seeing the ones that people bother to post, for both sides of the argument. A lot of people will see awful pattern tiling, scoff, and just move on without screencapping it.
Actually if anything I'd say the people who put in effort to post "good" planets outnumber the other side of the argument. So we are seeing confirmation bias.
Have been slowly making my way back from Colonia these last couple months, stopping by at literally hundreds of planets, seeing them go through a few patches that improved their appearance from orbit, then worsened it, then improved it again (but not as good as way before), then noticeably improved performance at last. The tiling has not been a real issue for me since late summer at least, found an instance of a recognizable pattern just yesterday, and even that was hardly in your face. The issue is still around at varying degrees of severity (I can remember Kremavi being an embarassing example, and I guess it might still be, I'll pay a visit again when I'm back in the bubble), but it's surely far, far less of an issue compared to what it was once.
The ubiquitous large crater with the exaggerated and badly blended ejecta rays that marks each and every planet in the galaxy, on the other hand, is currently far of a bigger offender in my opinion, as far as planets appearance is concerned.
Regarding the "confirmation bias" thing, I can't see how one would expect to see around more bad looking images than good looking ones...like, you know, people who love to take photos do that mostly to capture the best view and the beauty of something...rather sure you'll find substantially more pics of sunsets on the sea and crisp mountain valleys, than overcast skies over suburban apartment blocks or coal factories in a foggy afternoon. There is clearly a confirmation bias at work, it's confirmed that people at large like to highlight good looking things more than bad ones.
In the very specific context of this game, highlighting a prominent issue with proper visual documentation is absolutely a good thing to do, and doesn't invalidate the other two millions pics purposely not showing it for the sake of taking a good looking pic. Different images taken for different purposes. Everyone is welcome to take as many pictures of bad tiling as possible to show developers the issue is still there, "confirmation bias" in relation to the thousands good looking images posted elsewhere is only in the minds of who wants to stir antagonistic arguing for the sake of it.