Trailblazers | Update 3.4
- Thread starter Phil W
- Start date
Perhaps due to it being too binary right now - either you still have a supporting system and nothing happens, or you don't and the system falls from exploited.
The automatic decay merely from being over 25% is something which I sincerely hope Frontier will reconsider, but I could see something like if a Stronghold/Fortified go down a state, then all systems supported by it suffer decay. That'd diminish the benefit of all the overlapping going on, and reward attackers for tackling it even when it doesn't cause anything to drop.
Last edited:
One of the major flaws in Powerplay is that Kumo Burger will not deliver to my apartment building. The parking lot is too dangerous.
Excuse me, but that's completely
and limits the game. Who appointed anyone as a leader, or who has the power to proclaim themselves Secretary General or CEO of Le Yong-Rui? Calling you a dissident for not following their "strategy."I can already see BTF players making non-aggression treaties... in a single-player war game.
This is a criticism of players who misappropriate a power or system.
Things would be better if Frontier had members or an AI playing their chess game with clear guidelines, and the players were their pawns
. Objectives with three priority levels. Now we have missions that depend on where you're stationed in the Weekly Tick, with orders and missions, no rhyme or reason. Missions should originate from the Bastion Ship or from the power's representative in each system which clearly objective for the Power Play Chess Game.
And the changes are welcome. You may agree more or less with the metrics used, but in reality, an unattended system, location, or barracks deteriorates and requires constant supplies. But commercial supplies, not pamphlets.
The pamphlet system gives multi-accounts a huge advantage. I take my 700 Power items, change accounts... another 700, change accounts, and another 700. In 5 minutes, 2,100 merits for the power in question.
o7
So, Trailblazers was always all about Power Play, and not about colonization?Excuse me, but that's completely
I can already see BTF players making non-aggression treaties... in a single-player war game.
This is a criticism of players who misappropriate a power or system.
Things would be better if Frontier had members or an AI playing their chess game with clear guidelines, and the players were their pawns
Missions should originate from the Bastion Ship or from the power's representative in each system which clearly objective for the Power Play Chess Game.
And the changes are welcome. You may agree more or less with the metrics used, but in reality, an unattended system, location, or barracks deteriorates and requires constant supplies. But commercial supplies, not pamphlets.
The pamphlet system gives multi-accounts a huge advantage. I take my 700 Power items, change accounts... another 700, change accounts, and another 700. In 5 minutes, 2,100 merits for the power in question.
o7
I dont know ... tell me you https://forums.frontier.co.uk/threads/trailblazers-update-3-4.638963/post-10666365 ... for example.So, Trailblazers was always all about Power Play, and not about colonization?
