I already have Python, Cutter, and Anaconda dedicated mining ships. Is the T8 good enough to warrant the time, cost, and effort of replacing any of these?
I haven't used my medium sized Python mining ship in several years. I'm not sure why I would. I admit 95% of my mining has been for Tritium out in deep space.
Other than the fun of trying a new ship, I don't see a compelling reason to use the T8 for mining. Maybe if I didn't already have 3 dedicated mining ships I would consider it.
I suppose that if I throw out the FSD booster, this would give more cargo space in the Type 8:
Class 7: 7E cargo rack
Class 6: 6E cargo rack
Class 6: 6E cargo rack
Class 6: 6D shield generator
Class 5: 5A fuel scoop
Class 5: 5A collector limpet controller
Class 4: 4A refinery
Class 2: 1D prospector limpet controller
Class 1: 1I detailed surface scanner
for a total of 256 tons.
(But then, if I do the same with the Python, I get more cargo space there as well. Maybe 32 tons less, but still. I'm still not sure it's enough to offset the worse hardpoints.)
I think your thoughts are right on the money. Python remains the best M-pad mining candidate, the Type 8 will only be dethroning it for cargo hauling potential. Could probably be a nice exploration vessel too, a bit less jump range than the Phantom but you get the better SCO effects and I think it's the same number of optional slots.My thoughts:
- I already have Python, Cutter, and Anaconda dedicated mining ships. Is the T8 good enough to warrant the time, cost, and effort of replacing any of these?
- I haven't used my medium sized Python mining ship in several years. I'm not sure why I would. I admit 95% of my mining has been for Tritium out in deep space.
- Other than the fun of trying a new ship, I don't see a compelling reason to use the T8 for mining. Maybe if I didn't already have 3 dedicated mining ships I would consider it.
Could probably be a nice exploration vessel too, a bit less jump range than the Phantom but you get the better SCO effects and I think it's the same number of optional slots.
Yeah, the Python looks like a futuristic luxury passenger liner, not a dirty industrial mining ship.Too bad Type 8 is hampered by distro and lack of medium hardpoints. It has absolutely perfect aesthetics for a mining ship.
I think the mining lasers need a rebalance—the small ones should have way less distro draw, making them more energy efficient than medium at the expense of mining speed. This is how things work in most real-life situations, after all: a 1.1 liter 3-cilinder engine is way less powerful than a Top Fuel dragster engine, but it will get you much farther on a full tank
Already have that on the backlog I don't mine often, so it's not priority nr.1 for me, but they do look nice.You basically just described the pre-engineered mining lasers. Much longer range too. Seriously get some when you're back in the bubble.
If you have deployed a prospector limpet and you want to deploy another one to prospect another asteroid, how do you get rid of the first one so that you don't needlessly control two?You are still wasting a lot of space with the large shields, 4a refinery and 2 limpet controller. You are also using only 3 collectors and 1 prospector, severely limiting your collecting capacity
If you go for 7A ULC build , you can have 8 limpets out, in any combination you feel appropriate (6 collectors + 2 prospectors, 7+1, 5+3 etc) and still get 224 tons cargo (without GFSD booster) and if you dont have access to prismatics, normal 4A is good enough
I never get rid of the first one, but if you really want to, just turn the prospector limpet controller off and on again. Or fire your ECM--kills all limpets in range deadIf you have deployed a prospector limpet and you want to deploy another one to prospect another asteroid, how do you get rid of the first one so that you don't needlessly control two?
You need to watch the video "The Little Limpet".I never get rid of the first one, but if you really want to, just turn the prospector limpet controller off and on again. Or fire your ECM--kills all limpets in range dead
The easiest way is to use a separate prospector limpet controller.If you have deployed a prospector limpet and you want to deploy another one to prospect another asteroid, how do you get rid of the first one so that you don't needlessly control two?
It kind of makes no sense that the class-7 universal limpet controller can control 8 limpets, but the class-7 collector limpet controller can only control 4 limpets. There's quite literally no reason to use a class-7 collector limpet controller instead of a universal one...The easiest way is to use a separate prospector limpet controller.
Some people aren't happy until everything has been min-maxed to absolute perfection.If mining in a Sidewinder is your thing, then it doesn't matter if a Python or Anaconda or a Type 7 does it better. What matters is you are happy.
Yes, I use them in 3 of my miners, but I still use a separate prospector limpet controller for prospectors which allows the use of 8 collectors from the universal limpet controller.It kind of makes no sense that the class-7 universal limpet controller can control 8 limpets, but the class-7 collector limpet controller can only control 4 limpets. There's quite literally no reason to use a class-7 collector limpet controller instead of a universal one...
(The universal controller is slightly heavier than the collector one, but with those weights it doesn't make much of a difference...)