It would be more scientific to use AU/pc instead of ls/ly. Could FD please make an option for it? It makes me a little of bit tired while tring to divide numbers by 499 and 3.26 :/
Why do you need to calculate anything?It would be more scientific to use AU/pc instead of ls/ly. Could FD please make an option for it? It makes me a little of bit tired while tring to divide numbers by 499 and 3.26 :/
It would be more scientific to use AU/pc instead of ls/ly. Could FD please make an option for it? It makes me a little of bit tired while tring to divide numbers by 499 and 3.26 :/
It would be more scientific to use AU/pc instead of ls/ly. /
It would be more scientific to use AU/pc instead of ls/ly. Could FD please make an option for it? It makes me a little of bit tired while tring to divide numbers by 499 and 3.26 :/
AU/pc may be the scientifically correct units but to the layman it means absolutely nothing.
Now most people know light is darn fast and a good number know it takes about 8 minutes odd for it to get from the sun to the earth. That means that we can visualise Ls and Ly a lot better than AU. I mean astronomical units and parsecs won't mean anything to most people, I only know because I studied a space flight and satellite module as part of my Aerospace Engineering degree.
Also AU is a measure of the distance from the earth to the sun, in a universe of different systems and planets why would people still measure the Sol distance, Ls/LY are universal.
AU are used in the game and they should maybe be replaced, but who the Hek uses parsecs?
Hrm while AU/pc is more scientific, we are still dealing with pilots, not scientists even lore wise, and sticking to metric and ls/ly is easy to relate to for most everyone, yes, sure you could switch to the others, but what about then when you begin flying onto planets, then you suddenly need to switch units to get useful data there?It would be more scientific to use AU/pc instead of ls/ly. Could FD please make an option for it? It makes me a little of bit tired while tring to divide numbers by 499 and 3.26 :/
Actually it wouldn't be more scientific. AU is a randomly defined number, abstracted from an average of a constantly changing distance. It's the worst kind of measurement. It's the same as measuring distance in multiples of the length of your left shoe. Light seconds on the other hand is completely dependent on SI units and universal constants.
Only 15 rods to an entire hogshead? 'Sounds like you need some of Cmdr. Snakeoil's efficency-enhancing catalyzing tonic! It'll put pep back in your pistons and transmute your craft's consumption to lightyears to the liter! That's Cmdr. Snakeoil's efficency-enhancing catalyzing tonic -- probably not made from thargoid eggs!I get 15 rods to the hogshead, and that's the way i like it!
It would be more scientific to use AU/pc instead of ls/ly. Could FD please make an option for it? It makes me a little of bit tired while tring to divide numbers by 499 and 3.26 :/
or yards, or even better chains links and barleycorns.
I get 15 rods to the hogshead, and that's the way i like it!
OP - why not approximate. 499 is practically 500, which is an easy division. 3.26, call it 3 for most things, its close enough. Or multiply by ten, shift to binary, makes things simple.... what? Why are you looking at me like that?
Actually it wouldn't be more scientific. AU is a randomly defined number, abstracted from an average of a constantly changing distance. It's the worst kind of measurement. It's the same as measuring distance in multiples of the length of your left shoe. Light seconds on the other hand is completely dependent on SI units and universal constants.
Hrm while AU/pc is more scientific, we are still dealing with pilots, not scientists even lore wise, and sticking to metric and ls/ly is easy to relate to for most everyone, yes, sure you could switch to the others, but what about then when you begin flying onto planets, then you suddenly need to switch units to get useful data there?
Edit addition: I realize after a bit of thought that I might be looking at it the wrong way though, AU could easily switch to meters and such just like it does when close as well, so it wouldn't really make that big of a difference, though I still think ly/ls would be easier for most because of again solid definitions would be easier for universal adaptation especially if encountering aliens and such?
easier 'overall' just to stick to one measurement metric + light? they are pretty universal, where AU is defined around the earth's orbit. A metre is based around something solid, a wavelength I think currently and then light speed, those are two pretty solid definitions, where AU is from the standing point of anyone not on earth, planet#####'s orbit around star######
When I think about it, it is a bit odd that AU/pc is even needed to me at least. What is their advantage?
^This.
AUs and Parsecs are only really used because they are convenient measurements for Earth-based astronomy, what with the AU being the average radius of the Earth's orbit and the parsec being defined using the AU as a base. Lightyears and light-seconds are much easier to use for the type of play based in game, particularly when transitioning from megametres to ls (1ls is close to 300Mm).
It would be more scientific to use AU/pc instead of ls/ly. Could FD please make an option for it? It makes me a little of bit tired while tring to divide numbers by 499 and 3.26 :/