My beta2 results for laser mining tritium (no ssd, pure laser mining): 150t per hour in a single hotspot, 300-310t in a double hotspot (i think it was HIP 13476 13 A Ring)
Ship used: a Conda with 2 prospectors, 9 collectors and 3 medium lasers, 320t cargo + 6t in refinery.
The current results are looking really bad for tritium (and they're even worse for LTD)
Yup, Beta 2 had me drooling over tritium abundancy. LTDs, too, for that matter. But when FCs dropped for real it became abundantly obvious to me that had changed significantly, and now it is, as you say, really bad. But anything is better than nothing when you have little choice. We can't fix it but we can find out what the reality of the situation is instead of indulging in emotional hyperbole like I have seen in other threads.
So far, it seems that multiple overlapped tritium hotspots are no longer reliable at all, singles can be productive but at reduced harvest rates, as is mining in HSs of other minerals. Tritium SSD veins still give decent to excellent results but are somewhat inconsistent in distribution, laser mining has become noticeably less useful in all kinds of single HSs but continues to provide a consistent source, and SD scabs do little but draw prospector limpets because they glow -- that's about the same as always.
Apart from tritium, cores seem to be way down in frequency for all marketable minerals, not just LTDs. Even the reliability of ID'ing them seems to have shifted, with a lot of bright soggy potatoes acting as sirens for the miner, and shapes once relied on for core presence now having more duds than before.
Mining isn't dead, not even on life support; I'd call it Intensive Care, because it does take a more intense mining effort (in terms of time and use of various methods) to get smaller yields.
Thanks for posting results here, Commanders.