No-one's going to trust an AI to mediate on an employee dispute, or write a consultation document on redundancies, or determine the proper deferred income schedule for a contract.
Tell that to Amazon
https://futurism.com/amazon-ai-fire-workers
Let me tell you some facts. There was a study on how many workers a simple backhoe replaces. 1 backhoe replaces about 50 workers. 1 backhoe today cost about $85k on the low side. Min wage is about $8*49 workers (you need to have that 1 anyways to run the backhoe) = $392/h. This means 217 hours or 27 days and those 49 will cost as much as that 1 backhoe. By 218 hour, the 49 people would cost more. (Keep in mind, the amount of time will be a lot sooner since I didn't include a lot of other cost and I kept their pay down to min wage to give them as much of a fighting chance as possible.)
The fact is, the AI isn't there yet to replace any job.
But the equation to see if it's ready is to take over xyz job is. Is the output of the AI to the same level or better than the person. Like does the AI make less mistakes and get the same or more amount of work done.
This is assuming the AI is slightly cheaper than the person (which in most cases will be the case since the person requires sick days, insurance, a desk, etc).
However, there is no doubt in my mind you will see white collar jobs being replaced left and right when it starts saving money like the backhoe does.
A big thing to ALWAYS remember.
A company's job is to make as much money as possible legally. If the heads aren't always pushing for that then they aren't doing their job.
To get a little deeper into this. ALL companies will die. By the company making as much money as legally possible, this adds protection and extends the life of the company. Which means the people who do have jobs will have it for that extra time. A lot of people see that as a capitalist thing, but it's not. A company in all gov types follows that 1 simple rule.