My preference is for Space Legs. Don't get me wrong, I want and expect atmopsheric planets - but I see that as a natural progression from non-atmospheric planets and as something bound to happen - almost.
Space Legs, while supposedly designed into the engine from the get go as a confirmed feature, and therefore making it much easier to add later (right, David?) is to my mind a more radical development and therefore a bigger investment for FD..... So the longer they delay it, the more likely they are to find reasons not to do it. There's already been some rather mealy-mouthed expectation management in this regard which I felt reflected rather poorly on FD.
People are saying, "But they can't just have space legs - it will need appropriate supporting features to make it worthwhile."
No, really?
That's what Frontier and David Braben have been saying from the beginning to explain the delayed implementation. It kind of goes without saying. Same as Planetary landings did, and to some extent as everything does.
Atmospheric planets could simply be some tweaks to the flight model, and local lighting - and clouds.
I'm not sure that would entertain people for very long though - so it obviously, like space legs has to be more than merely the bare minimum.
Space legs is going to open the game up further to greater immersion and a greater feeling of freedom. It will allow more and more features to be added to the experience, perhaps starting with improvised emergency repairs to your ship, leading to boarding and assaulting other ships, infiltration of ground bases, covert meetings, enhanced trading opportunities, espionage missions ........and sitting in the station bar watching the ships dock in the bay while accessing trade data on your lap top.
Yeah!
