I still think people have got the wrong end of the stick when they say that an upgrade will always better then the last. I still 100% believe that they mean that a grade 5 will be better then a grade 4 upgrade. Not if you roll a grade 5 which is at the lower end, you then roll another grade 5 and it is guaranteed better then the grade 5 you have copied over. That doesn't make sense to me. If you re-roll a grade five, it is precisely that, a re-roll and it will still be random within the bounderies, so has the possibility to be worse then your current grade 5, it will just be guaranteed better then a grade 4.
Where is the post-FX communication?
- Thread starter playfuldreamer
- Start date
I still think people have got the wrong end of the stick when they say that an upgrade will always better then the last. I still 100% believe that they mean that a grade 5 will be better then a grade 4 upgrade. Not if you roll a grade 5 which is at the lower end, you then roll another grade 5 and it is guaranteed better then the grade 5 you have copied over. That doesn't make sense to me. If you re-roll a grade five, it is precisely that, a re-roll and it will still be random within the bounderies, so has the possibility to be worse then your current grade 5, it will just be guaranteed better then a grade 4.
I think word was that it will be "always positive outcome" is comparing to base module or approximate level. So yes, it is possible you get very awesome tweak from engineer at first level, which turns out impossible to beat with higher ones.
Last edited:
I think and hope Sandro will be holding those discussions about exploration and other topics as promised. For exploration I think they might have enough info though, at least I saw that extensive discussion and I think it has all info FD needs to make decisions.
As for binary decisions about existence of PowerPlay and CQC I am afraid that's not something up to players to decide or influence. Also both things have recieved lot of constructive improvement feedback, FD just decided for development hours to go elsewhere. It goes for everything in the game really. People for example thinks they make calls about priorities - but FD does. And that won't change. We can have nice discussion about orrery map but I can't force FD to make decision to do that in Beyond.
Unless I buy all shares and go to David and say we need to do this. Even then I suspect it will take some time to convince.
As for Beyond - what I want to see is sort of structure for discussion. Something of DDF v2, but with more specific gameplay offers from FD and organized feedback from players, so theres limited room for wild speculation.
Basically everywhere, but not where it matters most: In the game! :|
Landing on volcanic planets is actually part of Horizons.
I`ll pm that to you 3 years from now when you still won`t be able to do this.
How many planets with rollercoasters or wandering people have you seen in elite? How long has it been since Planet Coaster was released?
we have been through this already... 2 times... People were saying the same kind of silly wishful ideas because frontier was developing The Outsider at some point....
Last edited:
That's not an Earth-like world. It's not beige enough, and it has weather, atmosphere, and not enough JJ Lensflare. Get this trickery out of here.
Looks like I need to apologise, you really meant to get into that feedback loop...
https://forums.frontier.co.uk/forumdisplay.php/234-Beyond-Series-Focused-Feedback
You're a very naughty boy.