you must be new. we don't like that sort of stinky logic around here!
Why can't a mamba have fighters?
- Thread starter Vahnkiljoy
- Start date
you must be new. we don't like that sort of stinky logic around here!
On the subject of hangars, how come the Anaconda (for example) can fit a Class 5 fighter hangar in any of seven internal slots from Class 5 to Class 7, but the doors that the fighter emerges from are always in the same place...? 
I guess the same is true for SRV bays. Maybe the ship reconfigures its internal bulkheads to accommodate the location of the hangar(s). Or maybe FD told a few porky pies and the ship's internal configurations bear no relation to the external hulls.
I guess the same is true for SRV bays. Maybe the ship reconfigures its internal bulkheads to accommodate the location of the hangar(s). Or maybe FD told a few porky pies and the ship's internal configurations bear no relation to the external hulls.
Not all ships offer the same options.
A Mamba uses its internal space for other stuff.
Just like with real life vehicles.
I think that is perfectly fine.
The Mamba's sister ship, the FDL, does not have the fighter option either. This is simply how these combat ships are meant to be.
Last edited:
Me too. Reminds me of the interior of a 71 Le Mans i owned.
![[VR] scipio_77](https://forums-cdn.zaonce.net/data/avatars/m/62/62064.jpg?1621626354){kind=avatar}
I got a flashback to X3 from this... A Kyoto super-heavy carrying 6 Hyperion Vanguard corvettes each carrying two Argon Venti fighters.
A carrier ship being little else than a small or medium hangar with engines would be a new ship class. We'll see what fleet carriers will bring.
I really liked the way they did carriers in that game. IIRC i owned a ship that could launch 48 fighters in different wings.
Would be nice to see that in ED>