I'd have maxed out Rogue rank if they had one. Makes more sense to have that than the "Exobiologist" rank. No Scoundrel rank though.
Why / is (elite) horizons still doomed to die?
- Thread starter CMDR Karrde Sun
- Start date
I'd have maxed out Rogue rank if they had one. Makes more sense to have that than the "Exobiologist" rank. No Scoundrel rank though.
I just want the two playergroups to be re-united and be able to instance together. That to me is how I'll know Odyssey is finally at it's true 1.0 release version. The planet tech unfortunately all needs to be unified for both parties because of multiplayer syncing, but things like the skybox, lighting, and other minor stuff? If Odyssey is so much of an improvement, then why not just leave those Horizons things as-is, and let Odyssey's improvement be self evident, instead of replacing all of it with Odyssey's skybox and lighting.
You rebellious scum...!
If it's any consolation, I still hate the FSS and Engineers.
Well actually I just don't particularly care for them, but hate sounds like I'm more emotionally invested in my opinion.
Cheers.
Just anchovies on pizza on occassion though admittedly I haven't tried kippers on pizza. That sounds like it might be pretty good too.
Capers are also quite good, though I haven't tried them on pizza.True.... Everyone knows it is capers on pizza...
...
Darn it. You guys are making me hungry.
Might have to make some spaghetti later.
Last edited:
Baked beans on a pizza, now that's just wrong. People will be using pineapple next!
Weirdo.
I don't actually know, was responding to
Was just trying to imagine what new customers would be attracted to something that is at least 80% an fps where you don't even need to fly a spaceship - in a game that was primarily about flying spaceships.
No, it is about driving the SRV at ludicrous speeds and flyving around a lot...
The spaceship bit is just window dressing...
OK, who is going to tell him that legs were planned since 2012?
I neither said nor implied they were hoping to attract a particular demographic nor gave any indication at all that I consider Odyssey a good idea. I broadly agree with your appraisal.
Hush! It'll wreck the ambiance!
Mine can be divided into two camps - those who are still active and playing Odyssey, which is about 70%, and then the ones who I met during the LTD rush last summer who haven't been on in about a year. There's maybe 3-4 who haven't been on since Odyssey launched. (Mind you, I only have a couple of dozen people on the list so far from a massive sample size).
I mean, apart from the thousands upon thousands of people playing it.Nobody wants Odyssey
I've always chuckled whenever I read the posts that tell us open is 'empty' in Horizons... Yes, some folk have stopped playing, no doubt... But most of my friends are, like me, playing Odyssey (again, a tiny sample, but interesting)
People wanted an fps but not this fps is generally how it goes now.
but combat in ED has always been 1st person...
Deleted member 182079
D
From about 30ish on my list I'd say about 8 are still playing regularly, 2 of those EDH. The daily players are usually the same 3-4, the rest is more intermittent.
If that were in any way true, I'd be fully on board with that because that would be great.
Doesn't tally with one of the reasons cited for "no ship interiors" by FDev though - that being a scenario where your ship is under fire, and you don't want to be fighting off attackers and running to your cockpit to take off. Gawd no, that would be boring...
also what Han Solo had to do more than once... so, er, yeah...