Will lack of subscription kill Elite?

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Yea It makes my mind boggle people saying that subscription = insta delete.

Surely it depends on the proposition? If the content is excellent you still insta delete coz subsctiption. Seems short sighted. Obviously mileage will vary in subjective appreciation of the content.
 
I would only consider subscribing if they offered a more traditional multiplayer server with full guild support and player owned systems. I would subscribe in a heartbeat if they offered that.

And the moment you go down the guild and 'player owned systems' route, a fair number of the 'old guard' would up-sticks and leave. ;)
 
I would probably not go with subscription model for Elite - not enough content for me to be able to pay for it every month.
But hey - cheer up and wait for the updates after the holidays are over :)
No worst case scenario is they pull the plug on the servers and leave us with nothing.
 
I'm not to worried. For one thing, I think ED have sold pretty well, and have a core of grognard fans that is in for the long haul. As more stuff is added, that user base will grow. Each new DLC will also bring new players to the game, plus the inevitable game+dlc packs bound to crop up in due time as FD need some more cash to keep the momentum going.

Also if I'm not mistaken, FD have gone public, meaning an infusion of cash through IPO investors. This of course is a double-edged sword. Any success with ED will boost shares, giving more money in the till for further development. Take a wrong turn, and the effect will get magnified by the loss of share values.
 
Game subs are a dying breed in the industry. Many of the big players have gone on record to say that they will not produce sub based games any more.

I myself won't ever pay a sub again and if FD change the terms of my purchase they will owe me a refund as they will have breached trading standards by not selling it originally as requiring a subscription.
 
Hasnt killed any other none subscription games . Back in the 80s and 90's I played games and vowed never to pay to play any . Then Jumpgate came out and then SWG lol.

It is now going full circle and people dont want to pay a sub for a game . Sell fluff , people always buy that . New skins , new content . FD have a team of developers for all the games they do anyway and Im sure it is organic like most modern busnisses. No need for a subscription when you can flog friparies to the player base .

Expect an expansion to cost £20 + that most will buy who play . Get a big player base to sell it to and bingo lots of cash. Even if 100,000 buy an expansion at 20 quid thats 2 million . With the devs already there and probably most of the work already in progress FD will easily make money.
 
I'd gladly pay a subscription if it would deliver the structure, content, depth and service of a 'normal' MMO and not just bugged 10% of it. Would also keep the number of trolls and fanboys low which is a good thing for all games out there.
 
Oh dear. No. A fee isn't something you can just go and slap on a product AFTER selling it to your consumers. That's just absolutely wrong and I find it mind-boggling that there could be anyone who'd be okay with such a practice.
 
To answer the thread-starter's question:

No, I doubt it. I was worried about the same thing before I played it, and it almost stopped me from buying it in the first place. Then I learnt of their plans for paid expansions and all in the world was good again. They CAN make enough money to survive and continue making the game better with paid expansions, so there is no worries.
 
You forget what's out in the marked.
I played a number of high class MMO's in the past. Many started with a monthly fee and almost all had to change to a Free To Play model.
Today an MMO has to offer a very high standart of entertainmen to even consider to make money with something like an abo or a subscription because the free to play alternatives that offer the same or better are everywhere.
As much as I love ED it simple doesn't offers content required to justify a pay on time base. It's really Empty compared to todays MMO. Not many are willing to pay for Emptiness as imersive (I play DK2) as something might be it wont change that it's empty in its base. I can play it well with my imagination but I will not PAY monthly or subscription baseed for MY imagination.
 
Oh dear. No. A fee isn't something you can just go and slap on a product AFTER selling it to your consumers. That's just absolutely wrong and I find it mind-boggling that there could be anyone who'd be okay with such a practice.
I'd give you a +1 for that but the forum won't let me because draconian anti-spambot software is draconian.
 
And the moment you go down the guild and 'player owned systems' route, a fair number of the 'old guard' would up-sticks and leave. ;)
Yep, and I'm one of them. Player owned systems belong to some other game, and (IMHO) have no place in Elite. What has had me so cranked about this game is just how close to the orignal it is.


I'd be unlikely to pay for a subscription either. That goes double or triple for an hourly subscription. That would be an instant uninstall. Maybe it's because I'm American (I can see that many of you are not) but metered internet or play by the hour game models might as well read, "steer clear" as far as I'm concerned.
 
Yea It makes my mind boggle people saying that subscription = insta delete.

Surely it depends on the proposition? If the content is excellent you still insta delete coz subsctiption. Seems short sighted. Obviously mileage will vary in subjective appreciation of the content.

I am one that would insta delete. I have never supported the subscription model. I refuse to pay anyone an open ended stream of payments for anything I purchase. The only people that win in a sub model is the company of a successful game. Many claim a lot of good comes from subs. I disagree with every reason given. Is it a way to provide funding for a game and the developer? Certainly. Is it in the consumers best interest to pay for a game based on this model? Absolutely not.
 
Will an asteroid destroy Earth? Will auntie Ethel fart at breakfast? Will Elite fail without subscriptions? Yes, Ethel will fart during breakfast, don't know about the other two though.
 
The company just received a £40 million investment IIRC, the kind of money that people don't give away to lost/unprofitable causes.

Stick to playing games and let the company do its business its way.
 
Micro-transactions and a continuous supply of new DLC can work as other F2P titles have shown, e.g. mainstream MOBAs (Dota, LOL, etc.), Planetside 2.

But for that to work ED has to established a large player-base of which tens-of-thousands have to be playing per day in average.
 
Not eveyone will like the game, not every one has to pay subscription after the initial amount of time you get with the purchase.

Lots and lots of people like the game as it is now and want to see its potential met.

I just dont see how they can provide 1000 of hours of content (which the game shell can do easily) for just 40 quid.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -



If they like the game why wont they pay £5 for 100 hours of play, much cheaper than most games.

just NO!

The new addons will cost a couple of dollars and if they want more money they have to ask their shareholders.
 
Subscriptions? you kiding me? there is no mentally sane brain on the planet that would be willing to pay for what we have now in elite, the only thing that is going to kill the game is the lack of contect and the rushed basic features introduced for the release.
 
Last edited:
Micro-transactions and a continuous supply of new DLC can work as other F2P titles have shown, e.g. mainstream MOBAs (Dota, LOL, etc.), Planetside 2.

But for that to work ED has to established a large player-base of which tens-of-thousands have to be playing per day in average.

please dont mention PS2 - Thats the best example of how low a company and a dev-team can sink!
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom