Wolf-Rayet Stars of the Milky Way

Hello all,

Some of you may have seen or be participating in Andrew Gaspur's List of O-type stars project. With Andrew's permission, I am starting a similar project for Wolf-Rayet class stars. Andrew has kindly agreed to let me use his spreadsheet format.

Wolf-Rayet stars are among my favorite space objects. They're the hottest stellar objects, up to 200,000 kelvin; and very often are found inside planetary nebula. These incredible objects put out so much power they usually blast off much of their outer layers to form the nebula we see. They represent a late stage in the evolution of highly massive stars, usually O-type. Their massive power comes from either helium fusion or sometimes carbon-nitrogen-oxygen fusion.

There should be only around 1000 of these objects in the whole galaxy, so making a catalog won't be an endless task! Even better, many of these objects are at the heart of nebula, so we'll also be helping to build a nebula catalog.


2NOQGgdl.jpg



As with Andrew's project, there is a spreadsheet for entering data on these stars, and anyone who wishes to contribute can do so. We're looking both for general data (name, spectral type), but the best data is for you to go the system itself and scan the object!

The spreadsheet can be found here: Wolf-Rayet Stars of the Milky Way



Taken from Andrew's original post:

Now the big question is: Where do I find Wolf-Rayet stars?

Since they tend to be the most (or more) massive stars in a given sector, they can usually be found in star systems with certain letter codes in them. It currently appears that all procedurally generated Wolf-Rayets are found in systems with "AA-A h" classifications. Example: Tiefua AA-A h0


There may be other code types from procedural WRs. If so, they are likely to be:

- AA-A
- BA-A
- CL-Y
- DL-Y
- EG-Y
- FG-Y

However, many of these stars are also found inside nebula! Keep your eyes out for planetary nebula, and you'll often find them inside. To find existing known WR stars - for cataloging and for traveling to find and add data - you can also use EDSM's body search feature: https://www.edsm.net/en/search/bodies

A great many of the WR stars are found in the common star catalogues: HD, HIP, BD, CSI, and GCRV.

Thank you to all who choose to contribute!

ibanix
Cmdr Heavy Johnson
 
Last edited:
Here's a list of all the proc-gen WR systems that I found and tagged during the span of the SHEPARD mission (151 of them spread across 115 systems):

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VsBy6LDO38lkBctIfF_NORt6cpWm_PWN1mUrEL8XVh4/edit?usp=sharing

If the information here is of interest then you've got no issue with me adding them in, correct?

In my experience looking for them, they've only ever been found in mass code 'H' systems. Then again those are the only kinds of systems I ever checked, so your mileage may vary. However, I have a very strong doubt you'll ever find them in any other kind of proc-gen system outside of AA-A H systems.
 
Last edited:
Here's a list of all the proc-gen WR systems that I found and tagged during the span of the SHEPARD mission (151 of them spread across 115 systems):

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VsBy6LDO38lkBctIfF_NORt6cpWm_PWN1mUrEL8XVh4/edit?usp=sharing


If the information here is of interest then you've got no issue with me adding them in, correct?

Good lord man, that is exceptional data! I'm kind of stunned you kept such detailed records for your expedition. Did you do that for just WR, or other star and body classes as well?

I have absolutely no problem with you adding the data in. If you have info on if the systems had multiple bodies, that's also helpful. Also, I'm considering changing/dropping the luminosity class, as it appears every WR is a luminosity class I.


In my experience looking for them, they've only ever been found in mass code 'H' systems. Then again those are the only kinds of systems I ever checked, so your mileage may vary. However, I have a very strong doubt you'll ever find them in any other kind of proc-gen system outside of AA-A H systems.

I believe you may be correct. A check of EDSM for WR type bodies doesn't show any of them except for "AA-A h" class bodies. That will make finding them *significantly* easier. Thank you!
 
There's another sheet there that I've been compiling for supergiant stars that I visited and tagged, because those were a topic of particular interest as well. I was going to filter out the ones that were already tagged but if someone else puts together a master list of supergiant stars I'll keep those previously-tagged ones and credit the commanders in question. ;)

As far as information regarding multiple bodes I have that as well, because I took system map screenshots for every single untagged WR system that I visited. Only a small portion of them had anything other than the main star (or stars), with the exception of a few which had the odd gas giant.

Then of course, there were a couple like this, both with Herbig AeBe stars as the primary:

OeWp6wp.png


1CVfQSb.png


Trust me when I say that when I get to moving my data from my sheet to yours, all that information will be given its due diligence! :D
 
Last edited:
This one's colder than Buboes' Star, in fact. That one is 428K, mine is 398K. Coldest one I've got on that list now that I look at it a little closer.

I think the coldest on record is 2 degrees Kelvin.
 
Last edited:
I've tagged quite a few, including some on the current trip I'm on. Never seen them on anything other than aa-a h designation.
 
EDDB lists 1922 of them at the Moment (all W-Classes combined). So in fact there are a lot more than 1000 of them, since EDDB lists only the 0.003% of the galaxy that is yet discovered.
 
I have about 130 or 140, but none in a spreadsheet of my own (only sysmap screenies). 120 of them are on one of EfilOne's spreadsheets, though.
 
I have one Wolf-Rayet of my own inside a nebula that's not on EDDB: CSI+16-20178, inside the IC 4997 nebula. It is up on EDSM though, so it has coordinates: see here. It's W5 I, and here's a screenshot:


Others I've discovered should be up on EDDB. If you need screenshots, then I remember me discovering the ones in the Gehoo sector, so I can get you those at least.
 
Last edited:
Quick question: Will it be an issue that I have imgur links for all my entries? I can get rid of 'em but it's easier for me to just copy and paste everything.

EDIT: Scratch that, I figured out how to paste just values and leave out the links. Nevermind~
 
Last edited:
EDDB lists 1922 of them at the Moment (all W-Classes combined). So in fact there are a lot more than 1000 of them, since EDDB lists only the 0.003% of the galaxy that is yet discovered.

Hm, you're right; I guess FDev didn't want to be limited to real-world values.

- - - Updated - - -

I have one Wolf-Rayet of my own inside a nebula that's not on EDDB: CSI+16-20178, inside the IC 4997 nebula. It is up on EDSM though, so it has coordinates: see here. It's W5 I, and here's a screenshot:
[url]http://i.imgur.com/EqvhYZMt.png[/url]

Others I've discovered should be up on EDDB. If you need screenshots, then I remember me discovering the ones in the Gehoo sector, so I can get you those at least.

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
In order to allow for large-scale pasting of data into the sheet, I've moved the Luminosity field to after the coordinates. This should prevent an issue where people try to paste a whole row of data, but the protection on the luminosity field prevents this from being allowed.
 
One thing I feel the need to recommend with the fields pertaining to the number of other bodies in each respective system is supergiants. It is very common to find supergiants as companion stars to Wolf-Rayets, be they orbiting obnoxiously close or just simply sharing the same system. I noticed you have WRs, black holes and O types but Supergiants are a must.
 
Black holes were a carry-over from Andrew's O-type sheet. In retrospect I don't think I've seen any WRs with BHs, but I agree that supergiants are more common; I will make the change.

I'm also considering dropping the luminosity field, since all WRs seem to be classified as luminosity class I. I could switch this to WR type (WN, WNC, WO, WC); but that info is already present in the stellar classification.
 
Very cool! Yeah, it's somewhat uncommon to see WRs in black hole systems.

AeBe stars as well, though I have been seeing those a little more frequently as of late, but there's a 'remarks' field that I'll probably use if I'm focused on a system like that.

Next step will be the slow and gradual process of filling out XYZ coordinates. Shouldn't take too long. :)
 
Back
Top Bottom