It’s the final result that matters now and unfortunately the votes were changed because some of you decided that two toed sloth is the more realistic version for zoo’s. And those are the facts and this is the truth 
For me that kind of actions are biased and unacceptable. It’s interfering into the authenticity of votes and it’s should not have taken place. Ever.
Nobody ever asked people of generic votes what kind of sloth they’ve chosen so votes for certain species should stay separated from generic votes. Especially in the case of such a hot topic as sloth.
I understand how much work you must have put into this project and I’m sorry if my opinion hurt your feelings. It was not not my intention.
But honestly it was was not something you should have done in the first place. It’s not for us to decide for which species more than 100 people have put their votes
Probability calculus and google algorithm speak for themselves…

For me that kind of actions are biased and unacceptable. It’s interfering into the authenticity of votes and it’s should not have taken place. Ever.
Nobody ever asked people of generic votes what kind of sloth they’ve chosen so votes for certain species should stay separated from generic votes. Especially in the case of such a hot topic as sloth.
I understand how much work you must have put into this project and I’m sorry if my opinion hurt your feelings. It was not not my intention.
But honestly it was was not something you should have done in the first place. It’s not for us to decide for which species more than 100 people have put their votes

Probability calculus and google algorithm speak for themselves…
Last edited: