I think the plan is to only have one list or we are still working that outJust so it's in writing, if a sequel is ever announced I would like to and plan on curating the bird wishlist.
I agree I feel the most accurate way to get data on what people want is to not split the data between the groups at allI think we should leave it to voters to decide what they consider to be habitat or exhibit animals, as no objective criteria exist
Also my stance is firmly on less than 100 entries per person it takes forever to sort and it will mean each list will have infinitely more one off animals in them. The main 25 animal meta Wishlist voters had on average 0.08 unique animals in their lists and it still has 229 animals that only one person voted for if we more than quadruple the list we are going to end up with a much larger tail in the data which helps no one. Having people be concise in what they want is important and im sure if we dont hate long wishlists now we will when we have sorted upwards of 500.