Surely, but snowy owls would be betterPuffins are still a good pick, imo! They add bird to the arctic.
Surely, but snowy owls would be betterPuffins are still a good pick, imo! They add bird to the arctic.
That statement was in no way about if bunnys are a "good pick" for the game, eventhough personally theyd be pretty rad, but just about the fact that anectodal evidence might as well be no evidence aslong as their isnt a better source backing it upSometimes perception =/= reality. As someone who lives near rabbits and raccoons, I find them so mundane that my attention more easily passes over them than something like a coati, which I don't see too often. Also, when I've seen rabbits in zoos, they are sometimes sequestered in tiny hutches and/or aren't included on the map. They are very easy to miss. Raccoons often have small enclosures, too. In wildlife centers with fewer distractions or in the wild when one surprises me, I'm way more likely to notice a raccoon. Therefore, I strongly associate them with wildlife centers and pest animals even if they have a decent presence in bigger zoos. From what I understand, many other people feel similarly. That isn't to say they're a 'bad' pick, but they might not appeal so much to people who live near them.
If the Bush dog would be added:Sad hot take that i wish was different:
Im pretty sure the next pack will be a pretty big dissapointment. Everyone counting on the focus being on underrepresented groups is setting themselves up for disapointment
Even if we get the south america revisit that everyone wants i really doubt its gonna be a good pack.
I think this is a great template, but I like the idea of certain packs going heavy on some areas. For example, a savannah DLC should be ungulate-heavy, while a jungle DLC would be more monkey/arboreal-heavy, and wetlands bird-heavy, etc. So in the end the different categories would all balance each other out. But unfortunately we don't live in that world.I think it is good to have DLCs give a little bit for everyone. This would be how I make DLCs with balance in mind:
Basically bring back packs like Wetlands, just give 3/7 slots for not-mammals.
- Dog/Cat/Bear (Carnivora)
- Rodent/Primate
- Ungulate
- Ungulate/Rodent/Primate/Carnivora (bonus mammal slot)
- Habitat reptile
- Bird #1
- Bird #2
Well yeah but as you said we don’t have a perfect system like that. Personally I do like the little bit of everything approach, but yeah maybe in a place where Arid gave us ungulates, tropical gave us arboreal mammals, and wetlands gave us birds things might be a bit better.I think this is a great template, but I like the idea of certain packs going heavy on some areas. For example, a savannah DLC should be ungulate-heavy, while a jungle DLC would be more monkey/arboreal-heavy, and wetlands bird-heavy, etc. So in the end the different categories would all balance each other out. But unfortunately we don't live in that world.
I like the idea of balanced packs where it makes sense. I agree with others that certain themes should come with higher concentrations of specific taxa. I think this is the balance I like:My new hot take: I genuinely don’t care if we get another bear, dog, cat, antelope/bovid, etc. in the next pack, as long as the pack is actually balanced out. Birds and reptiles aren’t gonna get better in one dlc, and we also aren’t gonna get a bird centric dlc anyways. With that being said, packs should be made with balance in mind. The main issue I have been having is we will get packs that are 50% or more Carnivora or ungulata and then have any other animal make up the remainder. Which is what has made me so bitter, not only are we getting a lot of the same animals, they are making up a lot of the same packs too.
I think it is good to have DLCs give a little bit for everyone. This would be how I make DLCs with balance in mind:
Basically bring back packs like Wetlands, just give 3/7 slots for not-mammals.
- Dog/Cat/Bear (Carnivora)
- Rodent/Primate
- Ungulate
- Ungulate/Rodent/Primate/Carnivora (bonus mammal slot)
- Habitat reptile
- Bird #1
- Bird #2
Same. Is like i'm just waiting, not expecting. I'm sure it won't be the SA dlc i need and want nor it will feature 4 birds like i would like.I’ll say this here as a “hot take” but I want to see the news for the upcoming DLC just to see if I am disappointed with the results. Like I’m 80-90% sure the DLC “won’t go my way” so I mostly just want to see what the potential results are.
Obviously I would love to be mistaken, but man, I really don’t have my hopes up.
I think people are more lenient towards more penguins and crocodilians because we have such limited selections or habitat birds and reptiles that we are willing to take whatever we can get, they are by no means my priorities within their class but still have some small gaps that they could fill in like a small Antarctic penguin or an African crocodileBears have been treated even better! Yet, no one is against the American Black Bear... No one is against a fourth penguin or another crocodilian...
Why are people so against a new dog?
This would a genuinely great format, I genuinely hope the next dlc gives us both a bird and a monkey and basically regardless of what they are I will be happy. Although saying that I would totally be happy for some packs quite heavily rated towards birds and monkeys, my ideal Latin America pack would probably contain 3 birds, 3 monkeys and the maraMy new hot take: I genuinely don’t care if we get another bear, dog, cat, antelope/bovid, etc. in the next pack, as long as the pack is actually balanced out. Birds and reptiles aren’t gonna get better in one dlc, and we also aren’t gonna get a bird centric dlc anyways. With that being said, packs should be made with balance in mind. The main issue I have been having is we will get packs that are 50% or more Carnivora or ungulata and then have any other animal make up the remainder. Which is what has made me so bitter, not only are we getting a lot of the same animals, they are making up a lot of the same packs too.
I think it is good to have DLCs give a little bit for everyone. This would be how I make DLCs with balance in mind:
Basically bring back packs like Wetlands, just give 3/7 slots for not-mammals.
- Dog/Cat/Bear (Carnivora)
- Rodent/Primate
- Ungulate
- Ungulate/Rodent/Primate/Carnivora (bonus mammal slot)
- Habitat reptile
- Bird #1
- Bird #2
At this point there aren't very many classic carnivores I think would be valuable editions other than the ABB and a small jungle cat such as the ocelot
- Classic Carnivora 1-2 (at least one cat/dog/bear is good, but more than 2 gets to be too much)
That’s a good way of saying how I feel, I’m not excited or anticipating, I’m just waiting. I agree, if it had to be any pack it would be SA, or atleast a pack with some half decent birds and a NWM.Same. Is like i'm just waiting, not expecting. I'm sure it won't be the SA dlc i need and want nor it will feature 4 birds like i would like.
Why should the black headed be the go to species?I think people are more lenient towards more penguins and crocodilians because we have such limited selections or habitat birds and reptiles that we are willing to take whatever we can get, they are by no means my priorities within their class but still have some small gaps that they could fill in like a small Antarctic penguin or an African crocodile
This would a genuinely great format, I genuinely hope the next dlc gives us both a bird and a monkey and basically regardless of what they are I will be happy. Although saying that I would totally be happy for some packs quite heavily rated towards birds and monkeys, my ideal Latin America pack would probably contain 3 birds, 3 monkeys and the mara
At this point there aren't very many classic carnivores I think would be valuable editions other than the ABB and a small jungle cat such as the ocelot
Also going to throw out another hot take:
The black headed spider monkey should absolutely be the go to choice of spider monkey and I don't understand why it isn't
You can make that argument for a lot of other species though:I think people are lenient towards the ABB because at thi point it's just weird to have all but one species
I assume because unlike the Geoffrey's spider monkey, the black-headed spider monkey actually lives in the Amazon.Why should the black headed be the go to species?
Black headed Spider Monkey is distributed on fringe of South American continet. You can even make argument that it's still not Amazon animal. Maybe Red Faced SM could be a better pick, if living in Amazon is an issue.I assume because unlike the Geoffrey's spider monkey, the black-headed spider monkey actually lives in the Amazon.
Sumatran orang utan is also a big one. That one i actually wouldnt mind seeing how lackluster the current one isYou can make that argument for a lot of other species though:
I don't really see why bears should get special treatment personally
- Aptenodytes (emperor penguin)
- Groilla (Eastern gorilla)
- Loxodonta (forest elephant)
- Ailurus (arguably, depending on which species was intended by the devs)
- Hydrochoerus (lesser capybara)
- Camelus (wild Bactrian camel)
- Eudyptula (Australian fairy penguin)
- Struthio (Somali ostrich)
- Probably others that I didn't mention
It’s actually found in South America (admittedly not a very extensive range) and it is the most common species in captivity with sizeable distributions across both Europe and NA whilst the Geoffrey’s is almost exclusively found in NAWhy should the black headed be the go to species?
There's 3 species or orangutan now, so it doesn't work exactly the same waySumatran orang utan is also a big one. That one i actually wouldnt mind seeing how lackluster the current one is
I personally don't care much for the ABB...I barely use the bears we already have. But ABB does have a huge color morph variation as well as habitat versatility. Think Red Fox with color morphs and Cougar with habitats. So if we are ranking bear species the ABB should be pretty high up the list for a roster slot.I think people are lenient towards the ABB because at thi point it's just weird to have all but one species