The new addons will cost a couple of dollars and if they want more money they have to ask their shareholders.
I bet you a ham sandwich or chicken borrito that an addon (expansion) will cost a lot more than a couple buks.
The new addons will cost a couple of dollars and if they want more money they have to ask their shareholders.
I am one that would insta delete. I have never supported the subscription model. I refuse to pay anyone an open ended stream of payments for anything I purchase. The only people that win in a sub model is the company of a successful game. Many claim a lot of good comes from subs. I disagree with every reason given. Is it a way to provide funding for a game and the developer? Certainly. Is it in the consumers best interest to pay for a game based on this model? Absolutely not.
How big the player base needs to be depends entirely on their costs. They are a small team, so you might be surprised how low the numbers they need might be.Micro-transactions and a continuous supply of new DLC can work as other F2P titles have shown, e.g. mainstream MOBAs (Dota, LOL, etc.), Planetside 2.
But for that to work ED has to established a large player-base of which tens-of-thousands have to be playing per day in average.
ah a ED is doom thread
Yea cool I gets the free games, but no not cool because I want FD to have economic rational to keep updating the game.