Most Barycentric Stars in a System - do all the stars have to be orbiting a barycentric center of gravity? not the same as System with most binary stars, I too tired I'm off to bed
Largest Water Giant - Wredguia MI-K D8-21 a 13 with a radius of 24,626 km - rukmerot
Smallest Water Giant - Wredguia MI-K D8-21 a 13 with a radius of 24,626 km - rukmerot
Heaviest Water Giant - Wredguia MI-K D8-21 a 13 with 153.8736 Earth masses - rukmerot
Lightest Water Giant - Wredguia MI-K D8-21 a 13 with 153.8736 Earth masses - rukmerot
Need to correct this entry... I think you were too tired and mixed it all up
its the only one found officially so it does fill all the blanks
Need to correct this entry... I think you were too tired and mixed it all up
its the only one found officially so it does fill all the blanks
oh ok sorry... congrats!
I think I found a tier 4 star :
[img=http://s9.postimg.org/fx20imekr/Screenshot_0086.jpg]
As you see the yellow one is orbiting the first white one, then it is orbited by the second white one, that is orbited by the dwarf... and the whole of it is orbiting the main class O star (LAM01 Orionis A)?
Smallest ringed star - HD 221990 ABC 3 with a solar radius of 0.0445 - rukmerot
I *just about* beat it.
![]()
oh ok sorry... congrats!
thank you
"Thinnest ring (in a multiring) - Leesti 1 A Ring at only 538km" should be the total width of the multi ring so I've put it there, I could also add Thinnest ring in a multiring if you want. cant believe I missed that one, that's even where I saw you!
This is strange but it looks like they have removed some systems with proper names in Gamma - I don't remember where Etznabihik Mangk or Borom Caquit had been located in Beta3 and I can't find them using the nav search option (perhaps it's just a bug in the nav search as the one that I've proven with P Puppis and Praea Euq TT-A d31). Anyway, it's a moot point because they have changed properties of systems, as well, and eg. Difu not longer has so large gas giant as in Beta3. Perhaps we need to comb the records and remove all pre-Gamma ones or at least add a tag: "pre-Gamma". I'm going to check HIP 102466 to find out more data on the subject.haven't moved Enders, is Etznabihik Mangk C 5 still earth like or is it now a water world?
I geuss i found a new cathagory to add to the record books the water giant, this one being the first i find in over 2000 systems visited.
intresting fact , this system has a total of 27 stellar boddys 16 gas giants one water giant and some water worlds and rocks but none of em have a ring
This is why I like it so muchAnd I would, actually, prefer if you add it because I think I've seen thinner and smaller multirings.
This is strange but it looks like they have removed some systems with proper names in Gamma - I don't remember where Etznabihik Mangk or Borom Caquit had been located in Beta3 and I can't find them using the nav search option (perhaps it's just a bug in the nav search as the one that I've proven with P Puppis and Praea Euq TT-A d31). Anyway, it's a moot point because they have changed properties of systems, as well, and eg. Difu not longer has so large gas giant as in Beta3. Perhaps we need to comb the records and remove all pre-Gamma ones or at least add a tag: "pre-Gamma". I'm going to check HIP 102466 to find out more data on the subject.
This is a great system, not because of the water giant (I've seen many of them and I have visited less than 700 systems since the beginning of Gamma - they where added after release, probably, because I started seeing them when most Earth-likes changed to water planets) but because of the number of stellar bodies and gas giants (if you've counted them right). Water giant is obviously just a kind of gas giant that is water-rich and I think helium-rich are rarer. I'm not sure we should have a different category for them because class V gas giants are rarest I've seen and when we have them then why not add class I, II, III, IV and all the kinds I have forgotten. When we have them, why not add different categories for all the kinds of stars? Class L star with surface temperature of 1316 K is much rarer than T Tauri star with half that. This is for Patau to decide whether it's a great idea or just a Pandora Box.
Edit: BTW, Patau, is there a reason why you have not added Praea Euq TT-A d31 to records? 8 candidates for Agri worlds and all 19 at least high metal content planets (all in above 32% consisted of metal - I proved that with pictures in case of planets that did't look like high metal content ones but I could present pictures of all 19 separately if needed to) - in my book this beats 14 metal-rich moons by a large margin
I must point out teh system with teh water gioant also seemed to have most planets with life ( 10 i believe) but i cant seem to find it on the map anymore to double check
This is very bad as it's been a very promising system. This is also why it's good to always take a picture with the location of an interesting system - you could find it by finding close systems in case the nav search refuses cooperation.I must point out teh system with teh water gioant also seemed to have most planets with life ( 10 i believe) but i cant seem to find it on the map anymore to double check
This is very bad as it's been a very promising system. This is also why it's good to always take a picture with the location of an interesting system - you could find it by finding close systems in case the nav search refuses cooperation.
This is why I like it so muchAnd I would, actually, prefer if you add it because I think I've seen thinner and smaller multirings.
This is strange but it looks like they have removed some systems with proper names in Gamma - I don't remember where Etznabihik Mangk or Borom Caquit had been located in Beta3 and I can't find them using the nav search option (perhaps it's just a bug in the nav search as the one that I've proven with P Puppis and Praea Euq TT-A d31). Anyway, it's a moot point because they have changed properties of systems, as well, and eg. Difu not longer has so large gas giant as in Beta3. Perhaps we need to comb the records and remove all pre-Gamma ones or at least add a tag: "pre-Gamma". I'm going to check HIP 102466 to find out more data on the subject.
This is a great system, not because of the water giant (I've seen many of them and I have visited less than 700 systems since the beginning of Gamma - they where added after release, probably, because I started seeing them when most Earth-likes changed to water planets) but because of the number of stellar bodies and gas giants (if you've counted them right). Water giant is obviously just a kind of gas giant that is water-rich and I think helium-rich are rarer. I'm not sure we should have a different category for them because class V gas giants are rarest I've seen and when we have them then why not add class I, II, III, IV and all the kinds I have forgotten. When we have them, why not add different categories for all the kinds of stars? Class L star with surface temperature of 1316 K is much rarer than T Tauri star with half that. This is for Patau to decide whether it's a great idea or just a Pandora Box.
Edit: BTW, Patau, is there a reason why you have not added Praea Euq TT-A d31 to records? 8 candidates for Agri worlds and all 19 at least high metal content planets (all in above 32% consisted of metal - I proved that with pictures in case of planets that did't look like high metal content ones but I could present pictures of all 19 separately if needed to) - in my book this beats 14 metal-rich moons by a large margin![]()