Give it a rest, will ya. Reviews are actually up to the point and very well done - for example lot of other, AAA game reviews skew over lot of details, while it seems that people that review more difficult games like ED have more in-depth information about subject - as they are more interested in researching game more before reviewing it. Fact they don't give low scores as you think they should is a matter of subjectivity. Metacritic shouldn't have that much power over the games as it have. People should read at least snippets of reviews and decide before buying. Still, it is universal theme that they disagree with you about the state of the game as whole. That's just maths - you against the world.
It doesn't mean that some of your criticism isn't valid. It just means that in global terms, ED is very good start of the very promising game. FD so far hasn't given any reason to doubt their resolve to move game beyond this initial state, despite all mistakes. That alone also changes perspective of lot of reviewers.
It doesn't mean that some of your criticism isn't valid. It just means that in global terms, ED is very good start of the very promising game. FD so far hasn't given any reason to doubt their resolve to move game beyond this initial state, despite all mistakes. That alone also changes perspective of lot of reviewers.
Last edited:
, just had to nitpick this little thing).
