Guide / Tutorial Nutter’s explorers guide to the Galaxy

That's a good point although it's not that it is bad exactly, more that the time it takes to afford the Advanced Scanner in a small ship is quite minimum compared to the time that can be invested in exploration. For example, we only need to trade about 100 T of rare goods.

What might be a better system, in order to promote the skill of using parallax, could be for the Advanced Scanner to progress in range from a starting 1000 ls up to infinite/huge number depending on a metric. Perhaps based on the radius of discovered objects such that finding one at 2,000 ls increases scan range by a fraction of 2,000 ls. I like the convenience of the Advanced Scanner but I feel like the absence of using parallax is lost content.

trouble is you can't use the parallax technique to find black holes, it's a nightmare with the intermediate scanner when you know there's a black hole but can't see it
 
Thanks for the replies, you two!

Chevy, I guess a hand-waving modification to the idea could be that black holes would be detected at all ranges due to "space-time, Hawkins blar, blar, blar"? Would that be an improvement on the idea?
 
Found a black hole and a neutron star orbiting one another. The lensing around the black hole was nice, the neutron star pretty unexciting (not exactly sure what I was expecting from a small stellar remnant only a handful of km across). Still the system had 7 separate stars, with brown dwarfs orbiting the black hole/neutron star pair, and a blue main sequence star off to the side for me to top up my fuel tanks.

I of course had to follow in everyones footsteps and get a little close to the black hole for comfort. Only a bit of fried hull to show for it.

Onward to the Coalsack!

Not sure the Adder is the best ship to be doing this in. Plenty of jump range, but not a great view out of the window.
 
Onward to the Coalsack!
I've been there a week ago. There are couple of earth-likes there, but the search engine of the galaxy map is buggy with the Praea region systems. Usualy it points the wrong star, so write down coordinates of your discovered systems if you check the payment at the end.
 
any idea on this class of star ''WCO 1'' ???

Thanks
Not off the top of my head. What can you tell us about the system (any other suns?) and star (e.g. colour, mass, size, pulse?)?

"W" could be white.
"C" could be cepheid variable (not sure if in the game).
"O" could be a blue star, but that would seem to rule out W being "white".

Edit 1: Wolf Rayet stars use combinations of W, C and O in their classifications but sometimes WC or WO so a bit of a long shot. Could it be "WC zero one"?

Edit 2: Found "WCO" in relation to Wolf Rayet in a couple of places, Not sure if relevant thought.

http://th.nao.ac.jp/MEMBER/nozawa/papers/others/Tominaga2008.pdf
http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/202/1/012002/pdf/1742-6596_202_1_012002.pdf
 
Last edited:
That's a good point although it's not that it is bad exactly, more that the time it takes to afford the Advanced Scanner in a small ship is quite minimum compared to the time that can be invested in exploration. For example, we only need to trade about 100 T of rare goods.

What might be a better system, in order to promote the skill of using parallax, could be for the Advanced Scanner to progress in range from a starting 1000 ls up to infinite/huge number depending on a metric. Perhaps based on the radius of discovered objects such that finding one at 2,000 ls increases scan range by a fraction of 2,000 ls. I like the convenience of the Advanced Scanner but I feel like the absence of using parallax is lost content.

I don't find Trading or Fighting particularly exciting in this game, so it's been a major increase to my earnings which come chiefly from either exploring or mining.
 
any idea on this class of star ''WCO 1'' ???

That would be a Wolf-Rayet star with both Carbon and Oxygen emission lines in its spectrum. As I understand it usually it would only be written as WO1 because some carbon emission is implicit in all WO stars.
There are several different emission lines for Carbon (corresponding to different energy levels) so possibly it has some Carbon lines that are usually not present in a WO1 star. (Wiki page on Wolf-Rayet stars has the full list of what's usually used to distinguish between different points in the WC and WO spectra.)

What's the name of the star?
 
Question for deep space explorers..

Suppose you found an area of space, tens of thousands of light years away from Sol, an area that encompasses a 1,500 LY sphere of densely packed stars that dwarfs human colonized space, and all of which seem to carry the "unknown permit" tag that denies you access to those systems.


What would you think it was?



  • The location of the homeworlds of a soon-to-be-added alien civilization?
  • A place where some gigantic FD injected event will be held?
  • Or just a bug?


And would you tell anyone where it is? :D
 
Question for deep space explorers..

Suppose you found an area of space, tens of thousands of light years away from Sol, an area that encompasses a 1,500 LY sphere of densely packed stars that dwarfs human colonized space, and all of which seem to carry the "unknown permit" tag that denies you access to those systems.


What would you think it was?



  • The location of the homeworlds of a soon-to-be-added alien civilization?
  • A place where some gigantic FD injected event will be held?
  • Or just a bug?


And would you tell anyone where it is? :D

I am now scoiring your route maps for clues!
 
I found my first black hole. it was a weird one though, just a few times heavier than the sun and in very close orbit, practically on top of another star.
Ah, it's actually possible http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2008/smallest_blackhole.html
Too bad it didn't look like that. I'm currently heading towards the edge of the galaxy, nearing the Seagull nebula, then on to Rosetta. Is there anything interesting in the outermost arm? Looks pretty barren on the map.
 
ok so i lost the co-ords (besides it was easily 40k away) for the 'WCO 1' :( figure it must be wolf-rayet carbon size 1 temp 0. Thanks for the info peoples.

however I went to explore another wolf-rayet which is close to Sol. NSV 1056.

seriously cool skybox :)
 
I found my first black hole. it was a weird one though, just a few times heavier than the sun and in very close orbit, practically on top of another star.
Ah, it's actually possible http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2008/smallest_blackhole.html
Too bad it didn't look like that. I'm currently heading towards the edge of the galaxy, nearing the Seagull nebula, then on to Rosetta. Is there anything interesting in the outermost arm? Looks pretty barren on the map.
hey, i'm also currently at seagull nebula. maybe we will meet later today :)
 
I found my first black hole. it was a weird one though, just a few times heavier than the sun and in very close orbit, practically on top of another star.
Ah, it's actually possible http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2008/smallest_blackhole.html
Too bad it didn't look like that. I'm currently heading towards the edge of the galaxy, nearing the Seagull nebula, then on to Rosetta. Is there anything interesting in the outermost arm? Looks pretty barren on the map.

This one is out that way. Almost on top of the star. Wish it was streaming matter from its blue brother. Perhaps it's the same one?


Alternate view with the other companion in shot: 2 solar masses probably makes it a pin hole! Certainly invisible against the stellar maelstrom.


Here's the system view:

 
Last edited:
I assume you're referring to my thread earlier today. I'm hardly a beginner (Ranger) and I know they don't repair the important modules nor do they repair the hull. However, they weigh nothing at all (0.00 tons) and they can repair other modules such as the fuel scoop. There are no negative sides to bringing one or more of them along.

How the heck are you damaging you ship so much that you need to be repairing things?
 
hey, i'm also currently at seagull nebula. maybe we will meet later today :)
I took a detour to the butterfly nebula after I spotted that on the map. I'm currently sitting inside it yet I'm getting a bit too tired to carry on. I don't want to slam into a planet again by mistake or drift into a star while lining up a screenshot. My plan is to got to Thor's hat, then approach the Seagull Nebula from there.
 
...SO I GOT TO THINKING HOW COOL IT WOULD BE TO KNOW THE TOTAL DISTANCE WE HAVE TRAVELLED AROUND IN THE GALAXY.... wonder if the dev's would put something in our stats page to reflect that....
 
Anything interesting in Taurus dark region (think it was called that)? Thinking of going either there or Witch Head Nebula.
 
Back
Top Bottom