Intersteller

There was only one thing that bothered me about Interstellar, the way those landers had to be launched by rockets from Earth but are seen going back and forth between the surface and orbit under their own power.
 
There was only one thing that bothered me about Interstellar, the way those landers had to be launched by rockets from Earth but are seen going back and forth between the surface and orbit under their own power.

That's just a way to save fuel for later.
At least that's how I see it.
 
Last edited:
So when mis-jumps come in and Thargoids you should be happy.

Thatgoids I couldn't care less about, the difference between shooting down a bounty or what is essentially going to be a different kind of bounty.

It's the unexplained anomalies what I wish for, it's exactly what Brakespear said, I understand that the idea is to make this as realistic as possible and I think there is only so much creativity they will allow themselves because of that.
 
Agreed.

I think the basic flaw in Elite's approach to the galaxy, and one that is rather stunting its potential, is Frontier's strict adherence to "what we know" about that galaxy.

The fact is, we know very little, and so by only making use of that which we know, the galaxy is actually pretty dead. There are no unexpected planet types. There are no inexplicable star types. There are no unexplained anomalies. There's no dangerous radiation, no ancient shipwrecks with deranged automated defences, no Beast-like deep space sentient diseases, no danger of arriving at a star in the process of exploding, no forgotten mine fields, no roaming bands of Reaver-esque nutcases...

There's just... planets. And a specific list of star types. And absolute certainty when it comes to where/when you'll be able to refuel.

Its a little soon to be making such definitive statements about what out there.

One of the recent newsletters said only something like 0.0015% of the systems had so far been explored. Not what anyone could consider a representative sample.

Its rather like assuming we know what our house is like because we are familiar with the backs of our eyelids.
 
I went into the film expecting it to be rubbish (the trailers put me off completely, so I was suspicious of the high ratings people gave it, but I was seeing it for free...) and was completely blown away by it, and it had a great twist or two at the end. An unexpected SF jewel of 2014. The music on it's own is amazing, and a perfect fit for playing Elite Dangerous.

However, as SF films go, it required the viewer to really pay attention & have some science knowledge, so I can easily imagine non-SF fans not following half of what happened (as I heard happened to someone). It's the sort of film which puts people completely off SF, if they've not watched SF before (the film 2001 was rather like that). So it's rather a shame that the trailers (at least in the UK) tried to make it look like mostly non-SF film.
 
Watched it a few days ago and absolutely loved it, more importantly, however, I started thinking how much more thrilling it would be if exploration was actually dangerous in Elite.

Whenever I go into combat with another person in Elite my heart starts racing, I don't know what it is like for you, but it's an experience every time for me, especially when the other player proves to be extremely good.

Wish I had the same feeling in Elite while exploring, where every jump really did make you think whether it's worth it or not, who knows what's on the other side.

There is the ever present risk of making just one more jump then to discover that you cant fuel scoop enough fuel to make it back...
 
The only way the 'Universe' can kill you is if you intentionally fly into a star, intentionally. Thats it. Period.

Doesn't seem that way when you read all the "I made one tiny mistake (translation: a steaming pile of multiple huge dumbass mistakes) and my ship 'ploded without insurance, how the heck did that happen duh?!?" posts on here. :p
 
Doesn't seem that way when you read all the "I made one tiny mistake (translation: a steaming pile of multiple huge dumbass mistakes) and my ship 'ploded without insurance, how the heck did that happen duh?!?" posts on here. :p

Well Matt Damon exploded his ship in this movie cause he couldn't dock.
 
NASA is presented really stupid in this movie:

"Gravity from black hole causes tides?"
" You mean like the Moon does?"
????

Also they want to settle planet orbiting just the edge of black hole WHY?

And how exactly do they get back to orbit against 130% earths gravity with that tiny shuttle?

Thats 47 000 km/h orbit velocity.
 
I went into the film expecting it to be rubbish (the trailers put me off completely, so I was suspicious of the high ratings people gave it, but I was seeing it for free...) and was completely blown away by it, and it had a great twist or two at the end. An unexpected SF jewel of 2014. The music on it's own is amazing, and a perfect fit for playing Elite Dangerous.

However, as SF films go, it required the viewer to really pay attention & have some science knowledge, so I can easily imagine non-SF fans not following half of what happened (as I heard happened to someone). It's the sort of film which puts people completely off SF, if they've not watched SF before (the film 2001 was rather like that). So it's rather a shame that the trailers (at least in the UK) tried to make it look like mostly non-SF film.

Ahh, it was the twist at the end that I thought was ridiculous. It was nonsense and didn't fit with the film in my opinion.
 
Watched it a few days ago and absolutely loved it, more importantly, however, I started thinking how much more thrilling it would be if exploration was actually dangerous in Elite.
I disagree with everyone saying that AI or PVP fighting compensates to give the "dangerous" feeling.
Elite: Dangerous is simulating advanced technology that could go wrong in fascinating ways, for example what if a nebula suddenly became dangerous like in the 2D game Faster Than Light? You get in there, sensors and shields go off and so does flight assist. Sounds like a nice idea in overall, but to add excitement, there's now a rare asteroid belt inside that nebula and therefore a station nearby. You could get a ton of money in that nebula but you better watch where you're going or else you might hit something.
But I guess Frontier is too focused in making E.D. an exact replica of the earlier games (which I never played btw) so maybe they'll make exploring more dangerous/exciting when they'll allow planetary landings, and then hopefully allow the player to come out of their ship and walk around, immersion coupled with realism is what makes this game better than the other big names such as star citizen and Eve Online, so in my opinion planetary landings and EVAs are their only bet in making this game better than the other ones.
 
Last edited:
for example what if a nebula suddenly became dangerous like in the 2D game Faster Than Light? You get in there, sensors and shields go off and so does flight assist. Sounds like a nice idea in overall, but to add excitement, there's now a rare asteroid belt inside that nebula and therefore a station nearby. You could get a ton of money in that nebula but you better watch where you're going or else you might hit something.

Nebulas and asteroid belts don't work that way in the real world. Even if you're right in the densest part of the nebula, you might only be able to see it as a faint glow.

When planetary landings are in, I expect that exploration will become a fair bit more dangerous and exciting.
 
Actually, sine waves aren't half circles.


...


I'm sorry... I don't know why I do that...

Because maybe they indeed aren't! (I was thinking the same thing when I read that response)
I'm sure Matthew can find a Math expert in the office to get him to explain that! :)

Anyway brilliant music which to me wasn't as much inspired by Kubrick but much more by Phillip Glass's work done fo Koyaanisqatsi.
 
Intersteller ?? never heard of this title before.. lol

ahhh Interstellar.. yes i saw it.

This is the first real Movie of Christopher Nolan that doesn't convinced me at all..
Despite the incredibles FX i agree with people who said that this movie is almost rubbish.
And i don't understand who is over enthusiastic about it.
sad, but true.
 
I still cannot understand what's so special about that movie. Yeah that black hole Gargantua was spectacular (liked the name too), and docking scene is well done, but pretty much everything else is just a bad mix of plot holes, bad scripting and goofy physics. For me, Edge of tomorrow was the best Sci-Fi in 2014.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom