I tried this yesterday for the first time, and honestly, it doesn't seem to work as advertised in the OP. I went to an Anarchy system. I found a ringed planet with an RES in it. And then I plunged into the ring at various random points. Tried existing to SC and coming back from SC, and also tried just quitting to menu and logging in again. True enough, every single time it was something different there, but:
1. Never three pirates, not in 30 different attempts.
2. Quite often nothing at all, not for two minutes before I'd give up and try again. This was a roughly 1-in-4 occurrence.
3. Mostly just one or two "clean" ships that would never show a warrant even when using the KWS on them. Often green-colored.
4. I did in fact see some system Authority ships!
Then I went out and just dropped into random USS while dropping in and out of a cluster of "belt objects" that were roughly 3 Ly apart from each other. I saw a LOT more action both from the USS and in the belt objects, including several other Pythons and one Anaconda. The best part? They were ALL wanted. In every single case.
Where you went? Maybe its system depend or you might did something wrong as you said youre just began doing it... Have you see the video? This is pretty much how it supposed to look like if you find good spawn. Myself aint got any problems with getting any spawns.
1. Three pirate only spawns are rarest its like 1:100 chance or even less, and also they might be vary in quality. But i had few such spawns... as i killed already over 2500 pirates in rings.
2. To aviod loss of time, change spawns until you see first ship... go kill it, and you might get another spawns while you engage, if not, change spawns till succes... It may be hard sometimes to get anything...
3. What you saw was miners... they very low chance to have bounty.
4. Strange... Been at rings for weeks atm, mostly in anarchy, and only saw security at REP only at these.
One more thing... gonna hang around asteroid belts for bit more time to see if anything is correct with what i did wrote. Thanks for point that out.