I have a theory that I'd like one of the old (gamma, early release) explorers to confirm/debunk:
Judging by the systems I found explored in the "older tourist regions", all of them are completely discovered to the last icy planet.
Is it possible that discoveries made before 1.2* got the tag even when only space horned?
*thats the patch in which the "first discovered" tag appeared, right? I have terrible memory, so maybe it was 1.1...
Yep, your theory is correct. Let us all consider this a part of the history of the galaxy - an unexplained phenomenon at the space horns assembly line led to a monumental increase in the number of 100% discovered systems, but this lasted only for a few brief weeks as the affected horns begun melting due to excessive overheating...engineers are still scratching their heads, completely unable to trace the changes that took place in the atomic structure of these few devices in the construction phase...
Thank you for the confirmation.Yes - Systems that were given "discovered by" retroactively (that had been visited before the tag was implemented) all got tagged by the discovery scanner.
I know for certain because my first Gamma CMDR has tagged LHS 2552 right next to Founders World... That guy lived for a few hours and never surface scanned anything.
.I went to the Orion cluster and every object had been surface scanned and named by TRAV ELER.
I'm talking about thousands of system containing dozen of objects each!!!!
He hasn't left even lonly icy planets 400000 Ls from landing points.
I had to go to the Seagull Nebula to name something inside a cloud!!!
If you dare reply to this post you will get +1rep.
Now off to fit FSD interdictor and weapons in case I meet you out there.
.
Seagull Nebula?
.
I better hot tail it home again so I can sell all my scans for that nebula and grab that first tag.![]()
![]()
![]()
All in the name of !!SCIENCE!!![]()
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRGHHHHHHHHHH
BTW, i came back before reaching Seagull.
That's good.
.
I moved on from there... From Seagull to Rosette nebula, and then on again to the Jellyfish nebula.![]()
What is your jump range? I have 33, and towaed the seagull had to detour up. Especially Rosetta looks like it's outside the milky way.
I've got just under 30ly jump range. When I was going to the Seagull from the Horsehead nebula, I had to go along the Perseus arm before I could cross the expanse and come back to the Seagull.
.
but from there to the Rosette was no problem.![]()
Cool. I guess sometimes the shorter distance between A and B is not a stright line.
Now don't be like TRAV ELER and leave me a moon to name in Rosetta.
FRom this thread (i highly reccomand to participate: https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php?t=119065
Last post today:
"CMDR Astronut reporting.
Just found my first 'earth-like' but I can't take credit for first discovery. It's not in your list so here are the details:
system: H97B 9199
planet: A 8
full designation: H97B 9199 A 8
distance from Sol: 1282.91 LY
first discovered by: TRAV ELER"
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
- - - Updated - - -
What is your jump range? I have 33, and towaed the seagull had to detour up. Especially Rosetta looks like it's outside the milky way.
That 'trav eler' name has been popping up a lot for me too. I'm still in the Orion neb but I'm itching to move on and further out. On this particular trip I haven't entered a single system that hasn't got 'first discovered' tags.
Rosette nebula is well within the Milky Way.
<edit>
Way-hey, just found my first neutron star but I can't claim first discovery. That honour goes to Star Falcon, another name cropping up frequently at the far side of Orion neb.
I'm 860 ly straight down and about 85% of the systems have been discovered. I chose a totally random system as well - nowhere near a tourist trap.