DDF isn't significant any more - FD don't need our opinions![]()
This is the standard counter argument when anyone speaks up on the forums. "It's not your game, quite whining"
DDF isn't significant any more - FD don't need our opinions![]()
As a constructive response, I am against this.
I'm not going to write a post like a 5 year old, and whine for the sake of it... but here are my reasons to not liking the decisions so far:
About CQC:
1) CQC doesn't fit into the lore of Elite in the slightest.
2) CQC seems to be targeting the demographic of console players (as mentioned by FD themselves... "It's a perfect fit for Xbox players")
3) FD said they would never compromise the game for console players... they've gone back on their word
CQC is inevitble, so there's no point demanding it not existing, it's coming out whether players like it or not... but in regards to Xbone getting it first:
1) Kickstarter/ Beta backers paid a lot more for the game than other people. With the promise of early access to content and beta testing, it was part of an agreement on Kickstarter.
2) Why are FD giving the beta access to new console players? They have 0 experience with the game, and their feedback will not be based on existing knowledge. Their feedback will be literally worthless. Only experienced players can provide valuable feedback, since the balance between ships are known already. (Get ready for "Ermigerd, Beam laser is OP!")
3) PC is lead development platform. They should focus beta tests on PC first, not on console. Console should only beta test their console product, not an entire new game mode, regardless of what it is.
So these 2 points are bugging me. I'm not going to hate on the game or anything, I love ED. I'll continue to play it (no rage quit post here!), but FD's decisions are going back on their word.
No Ian, the problem is they don't do it enough. If Frontier had been telling us about CQC, people would have been excited for it, hype would have been built up, yes people would have complained, it's called FEEDBACK, the feature would have been tweaked and people would have been happier. People without XBox's would have said much much earlier "hey what about us?" and this whole rage all in one go would have been placated over many months.
But no, Frontier think the best business model is to keep things to themselves, keep their customers in the dark, and spring this stuff on us suddenly after months of nothing, and wonder why there is all this rage on the forum.
As a constructive response, I am against this.
I'm not going to write a post like a 5 year old, and whine for the sake of it... but here are my reasons to not liking the decisions so far:
About CQC:
1) CQC doesn't fit into the lore of Elite in the slightest.
2) CQC seems to be targeting the demographic of console players (as mentioned by FD themselves... "It's a perfect fit for Xbox players")
3) FD said they would never compromise the game for console players... they've gone back on their word
CQC is inevitble, so there's no point demanding it not existing, it's coming out whether players like it or not... but in regards to Xbone getting it first:
1) Kickstarter/ Beta backers paid a lot more for the game than other people. With the promise of early access to content and beta testing, it was part of an agreement on Kickstarter.
2) Why are FD giving the beta access to new console players? They have 0 experience with the game, and their feedback will not be based on existing knowledge. Their feedback will be literally worthless. Only experienced players can provide valuable feedback, since the balance between ships are known already. (Get ready for "Ermigerd, Beam laser is OP!")
3) PC is lead development platform. They should focus beta tests on PC first, not on console. Console should only beta test their console product, not an entire new game mode, regardless of what it is.
So these 2 points are bugging me. I'm not going to hate on the game or anything, I love ED. I'll continue to play it (no rage quit post here!), but FD's decisions are going back on their word.
No Ian, the problem is they don't do it enough. If Frontier had been telling us about CQC, people would have been excited for it, hype would have been built up, yes people would have complained, it's called FEEDBACK, the feature would have been tweaked and people would have been happier. People without XBox's would have said much much earlier "hey what about us?" and this whole rage all in one go would have been placated over many months.
But no, Frontier think the best business model is to keep things to themselves, keep their customers in the dark, and spring this stuff on us suddenly after months of nothing, and wonder why there is all this rage on the forum.
This is a fair comment ... but replace CQC with PowerPlay ... replace someone digging into the code with Frontier being honest about it ... replace not telling us, with telling us (would it really hurt for Michael to post on here "We can't discuss this because of a deal with Microsoft"?) I've been here a while and knew long ago about Frontier's relationship with Microsoft, an XBox version of Elite Dangerous was no surprise to me, but don't tell me Frontier had no choice in things.There is another aspect to this. Frontier are no-longer free agents here.
Firstly they're a floated company with all the rules that The City impose upon them with regards to announcements of products and news. Secondly, in this case they have to follow Microsoft's lead. Microsoft will have wanted a big splash for the launch of their new service and as such would not have wanted anything to leak at all.
However much those in FD may have wanted to tell the community it's highly probably that they were legally bound not to. Please remember this.
I will take e) Being angry that PP bonuses and RES are not working properly and the heads of the company leave for an expo to announce that xbox users pay less than for early access while we payed more than retail.
"Please tell the show audience... that... <sniff> we simply CANNOT go. There's a bug... in our asteroid belt... it makes the ships in there too easy to kill... we CANNOT LEAVE THIS BUG CAUSING HAVOC..."
"...so the heads of the company are STAYING! We're rolling up our sleeves..."
(developers: "Oh no")
"...checking out a working copy ourselves..."
(developers: "Oh my God")
"...and we're gonna FIX THAT DAMN ASTEROID BELT! Yeah! High-fives all round!"
(developers: "Next they'll want top-mount monitors with spinning cubes and someone to give them all bl---")
"...CAN WE GET SOME SPINNING CUBES IN HERE?"
Or is the current game going to get a speed boost in how quickly we can turn corners and stuff
arena comander......what a joke.... a shame what this game turns into.....
1. We paid more than retail to alpha/beta test.
2. xbox users are paying less than retail to beta test.
3. We already have an experienced pvp community with hundreds of hours of flight time who are better suited to give feedback on a pvp module.
4. We didn't want the arena module to start with because we've been crying out for content and hoped fd would be putting their time in to new content rather than an arena module. Since they didn't put the time in to content for the main game (stuff from the ddf etc) we feel entitled to have access to it as for a lot of payers we feel like we're in limbo right now waiting for fixes or promised content.
5. 1.3 breaks some of the pvp roles so a lot of players are looking for something to do until fd fix it. Tons of reported bugs from the beta bug forum are still in the game.
6. A lot of us think the 1.3 release was half baked due to them working on the E3 release (see 5).
Hah! I'll bet good money CQC beats the living daylights out of AC. At least the flight model works and is fun.