I think the link you just posted proves my point about working backwards from what you think the "message" is? You start with Ross 154, and then "find" it in the message, even though you yourself say several of the letters are difficult if not impossible to hear in morse in that post.
So, that's what I've been trying to explain (and likely failing at). I've just gone through over 20 different samples to produce the alphabet of these.
Were the assumptions about it being morse wrong at all, I should've hit dire straits at the second sample, maybe the 3rd, if I was lucky. I pretty much found every symbol I was looking for on first pass, using the symbols extracted from, say Ross 154 (being R, O, S, 1, 5, 4) and using it to separate and extract others.
e.g using the "O" symbol as my split in "COL" to extract the C and L symbols. That means, for C and L to be right, the extraction of O had to be right. If O was wrong, then C and L would be *more* wrong. So further analysis of this in sounds like "BERNOULLI SETTLEMENT" would well and truly fail.
So,,, basically if it wasn't morse, I couldn't have even come close to producing some sort of alphabet, purely from the amount of cross-referencing I did when extracting.
---
I tried to explain this is basically a plain-text crypt attack, and sure, it may be that I've lucked out, and the 21st pattern completely shatters the theory it's morse. That's why, based off the extractions so far, I synthesised EKURU A 1. If the recording comes back and it matches, then the extractions are correct.
Last edited: